Forum Moderators: mack

Message Too Old, No Replies

HTML 4.01 Validation and Free Websites

Geocities content fails 4.01 validation

         

MsDetta

2:27 am on Oct 3, 2002 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



I've got my personal website on Geocities. When I use the W3C.org validator for HTML 4.01 and use my URL, my site returns errors due to the content that Geocities adds to all of my pages. When I upload the files from my hard drive, they pass validation. As I am currently unemployed and seeking employment, I can't afford to go the route of web hosting with a domain name.

My questions are:

Will my site be approved by the ODP and search engines when it contains Geocities content that doesn't meet HTML 4.01 standards?

If I change the hit counter and guestbook from Geocities to another free service, will the site meet the validation tests?

Should I move my site to another free one? (I could set up and move it to my isp space.)

Your comments are greatly appreciated. :)

[edited by: Marcia at 8:15 pm (utc) on Oct. 4, 2002]
[edit reason] changed to generic host name [/edit]

heini

8:41 am on Oct 3, 2002 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



MsDetta - welcome to the board!

I do not think not validating is a problem in itself with DMOZ or other directories or search engines. Hardly any of those pass validation themselfes.
As long as the site works well, is usable, doesn't carry broken links you should be fine with directories.

Anyhow, if you are serious with your site I certainly would recommend to move to a - lowcost - host. Not sure how prices are at this time in US, but in Europe you get solid hosting starting at $/Euro 5 - 10 per month.
That's about as much as you spend on a meal...

g1smd

9:16 pm on Oct 3, 2002 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



The ODP does NOT reject sites that have non-valid HTML - there is no rule for this at all.

However, having valid, well-formed, HTML will guarantee that anyone, using any browser, on any operating system will be able to view your site - including the reviewing editor!

In the internal forum and on chat we have requests every day from people who say "http://xxxx.com/ crashes my browser, or just loads to a blank screen, please can sometime take a look for me, and review it/delete it depending on what you find".

There are loads of other editors who are either not savvy enough to ask for help, or are overworked with mass-submission, so will tend to leave such sites in Unreviewed forever. If a category is being actively tended by a local editor, a higher-up editor tends to leave them to get on with it - just taking an occasional peak to see that the Titles and Descriptions written look good, and are accurate, as well as making sure that there isn't a backlog of Unreviewed growing, and the editor isn't promoting their own sites. As such, a site with bad HTML (browser-crash type bad, I mean here) could get overlooked for months or maybe years. In some areas of the directory (e.g. Web Design), some editors are intolerant of such sites and would hit delete immediately on sites that don't render or crash out.

It helps us if web sites render properly. It helps us if submissions have good Titles and Descriptions. It helps us if the site is submitted to the correct category. Only the last two of those are actually in the Rules. Submissions that help us, are often listed quicker because editors under strain often opt for the two easiest jobs when looking at a category bulging with new submissions.... delete obvious spam, and list any sites that have already done the editors work for them.

g1smd

9:41 pm on Oct 3, 2002 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



Oh, and the stuff that doesn't validate on a Geocities page is all added by Geocities AFTER the </HTML> tag. This extra code appears to run their pop-up advert system, and begins with /object></layer></div></span></style></noscript></table></script></applet>.

I can see why they do this: simple errors in the code written by the user won't stop their adverts running; but I can see that this is trouble just waiting to happen.

MsDetta

1:43 am on Oct 4, 2002 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Thanks for the replies and Heini thanks for the welcome. I wish I could afford to move the site to my own dot com, but at the moment that is not an option.

:) I am glad to know that the ODP and other directories do not reject sites for non-valid html. One of the ODP editors has been extremely helpful and has taught me quite a lot, and I sincerely appreciate the time and patience that has been shown to me. However, it does concern me that my site doesn't pass validation due to the Geocities added content.

I want potential employers to be impressed with my design ability. I have received "done but with errors" when I've loaded the site using IE 6 and the option to "debug" has come up. These errors do NOT occur when I view my site from my hard drive. I have double checked all of my scripts, both internal and external. This leads me to conclude the errors are coming from the Geocities content. It certainly won't impress a potential employer to have "done with errors" on my pages.

I've already figured out the answer to my question regarding the hit counter and guestbook, because my pages without hit counter and guestbook won't pass validation due to the Geocities content, though they pass validation when uploaded from my hard drive.

My remaining questions are: Is there a free host that will pass validation? Should I try moving my site to my ISP space? Any other suggestions?

[edited by: Marcia at 8:16 pm (utc) on Oct. 4, 2002]
[edit reason] changed to generic hostname [/edit]

dingman

3:00 am on Oct 4, 2002 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



I would assume that any employer who knows enough to notice or care that your HTML validates would also be savy enough to know that you can't be held responsible for the extra code that your free host adds.

shelleycat

3:20 am on Oct 4, 2002 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



There are a large number of people around with their own webhosting who take on "hostees" and give them space on their domain for free. Most people don't want to host commercial sites but if it's along the lines of a portfolio and your designs are good then you should be able to find someone willing to host it for you. This will remove the geocities/freehost problem altogether and may also give you access to cgi etc. If you're interested, try a google search for something along the lines of 'hostees and portfolio' or sticky me for a couple of places I've seen this kind hosting advertised.

(note, I don't offer this kind of hosting myself but I know many who are both hosts and hosted and are happy)

martinibuster

3:22 am on Oct 4, 2002 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Administrator 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



Oh come on,
Surely you can afford $7.95 a month for hosting. There's no excuse for that.

MsDetta

3:28 am on Oct 4, 2002 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Dingman, thanks for the reply. If the employer doesn't care, then I doubt the employer would provide the "learning" environment in which I want to work. :) (prior accountant used to getting things right lol)

Shelleycat, I do like your suggestion of "hostee". If things don't work out in my employment search, I may start out on my own and this would be a good alternative to start out with. Thanks! :)

Marcia

8:25 pm on Oct 4, 2002 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



I have a couple of sites on space my ISP provides, and will be doing more. One is a commercial site with top ranking, which I'll probably move to a domain eventually, when it's expanded - but there's no rush. The latest one is a graphics site that I'll be submitting to directories as soon as a little more content is added. And I'm putting up another couple of commercial sites as soon as I get time.

I get space for 11, and there is absolutely no advertising, no extra code or banners, nothing on the pages except what I put on - so whether it validates is strictly up to how I code it. And I get POP3 and SMTP mail through my ISP so I can use separate accounts.

There is absolutely nothing wrong with doing a resume or small business site on ISP space, nothing unprofessional about it. A domain is better by far, and there are some *very* cheap hosts that are just fine, but in some cases it isn't possible and anything banner free is better than other people's blinking ad banners running.