Welcome to WebmasterWorld Guest from 23.22.182.29

Forum Moderators: not2easy

Message Too Old, No Replies

Flash MX

What makes it worth the upgrade?

     
1:21 pm on May 20, 2002 (gmt 0)

Senior Member

WebmasterWorld Senior Member korkus2000 is a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member

joined:Mar 20, 2002
posts:3732
votes: 0


Now that it has been out for a little while I was wondering what everyone thinks. I still use 5 but I am considering the upgrade. Is the compression better? How is the support for mp3's and video? What is the new feature that you can't live without?
1:36 am on May 22, 2002 (gmt 0)

Senior Member

WebmasterWorld Senior Member korkus2000 is a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member

joined:Mar 20, 2002
posts:3732
votes: 0


Tumbleweed blows through
8:23 am on May 22, 2002 (gmt 0)

Senior Member

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member

joined:Mar 8, 2001
posts:690
votes: 0


There was a thred that already discussed Flash MX and its merits.

Go to the Macromedia site and take the Feature tour it shows you all the coll new features available.

5:18 pm on May 22, 2002 (gmt 0)

Senior Member

WebmasterWorld Senior Member mivox is a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member

joined:Dec 6, 2000
posts:3928
votes: 0


Sorry about the weeds... I keep meaning to do my spring cleaning, but I hate to sweep. ;)

Doesn't Macromedia have 30day trial downloads for their software? A test drive would give you the best idea as to whether the download was worth the cost to you.

5:24 pm on May 22, 2002 (gmt 0)

Senior Member

WebmasterWorld Senior Member korkus2000 is a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member

joined:Mar 20, 2002
posts:3732
votes: 0


Ya I am going to do the download I thought maybe some of the people on the board have been using it for a while might have some insight. I guess they are like me and can't afford the upgrade at the moment. I just wanted to see if there was some over seen aspect that made it worth the upgrade.

knighty
The tour is not that impressive. I won't upgrade if thats all there is.

3:04 pm on May 23, 2002 (gmt 0)

Junior Member

10+ Year Member

joined:Apr 29, 2002
posts:72
votes: 0


I have been using MX for a little while.

The problem with upgrading in the past was that the new player takes a while to spread it's way around to all of the end users.

MX, however, has made a lot of improvements to files published for Flash 5. They've added things like run time shared libraries and runtime image swapping - it's good stuff.

There are also a lot of new components for Flash 6 like premade scroll and form elements. These aren't super useful however, because, as you know you can make them yourself.

5:44 pm on May 23, 2002 (gmt 0)

Senior Member

WebmasterWorld Senior Member mivox is a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member

joined:Dec 6, 2000
posts:3928
votes: 0


the new player takes a while to spread it's way around to all of the end users

That's the problem with any bleeding edge (or even halfway-lukewarm-new) web technology/standard... the end users software needs time to catch up. I ran into the same problem when I designed an interactive calculating form in Acrobat 4: I discovered none of the Windows machines in our office had their Acrobat Reader updated in over a year!

Because I fear that sort of upgrade laziness is not at all uncommon, I personally would wait at least a year after the introduction of a "new web technology" before actually implementing it on a commercial website.

Wouldn't implement any new capabilities of Flash MX on a live website until next summer (which gives you plenty of time to get really slick using them... ;) ), when people have had a good chance to upgrade to the new player.