Welcome to WebmasterWorld Guest from

Forum Moderators: not2easy

Message Too Old, No Replies

Fireworks MX

9:16 pm on May 6, 2002 (gmt 0)

Junior Member

10+ Year Member

joined:Feb 11, 2002
votes: 0

Anybody tried it? Is it worth the upgrade? Is there a better image editor than fireworks?
9:32 pm on May 6, 2002 (gmt 0)

Senior Member

WebmasterWorld Senior Member mivox is a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member

joined:Dec 6, 2000
votes: 0

Welcome to the wmw graphics forum! :)

I personally swear by Photoshop, but if you're doing mainly web graphics, I've heard nothing but raves about Fireworks, though I haven't heard anything specific about MX yet. Can't imagine it would be worse than the older versions though, eh?

If you're on a budget, I've heard that Paint Shop Pro will do just about anything you want at a much smaller price than Fireworks or Photoshop (even though it is plagued with an "amateurs only" reputation). Then there are those who swear by the Gimp, which can be had for cheap or free (Open Source and all that) depending on your platform. I think Gimp is available for *nix, Mac OSX and Windows...

Those are the Big Four that I know of... any one of them is probably quite capable of most anything you need to do. If you're on OSX, I've also heard good things about the "Stone Studio" suite of applications. Supposed to handle all aspects of web and graphic design, including image editing. It's a brand new product, but they let you download and try it out.

3:19 am on May 7, 2002 (gmt 0)

Junior Member

10+ Year Member

joined:Apr 22, 2002
votes: 0

I use Paintshop Pro, PhotoShop, and Fireworks.... Heee Heee, best of all worlds imho.

Fireworks is great, I dont have mx yet, will be getting it soon..... Currently using version 4... *sigh*

"(even though it is plagued with an "amateurs only" reputation)."

I agree, it has gotten a bad rep, and why I am not sure. I have found it to be a very usefull tool, and powerfull enough to do alot of stuff, and for the price you cant beat it (unless you have unlimited resources ;) )


3:44 am on May 7, 2002 (gmt 0)

Full Member

10+ Year Member

joined:Apr 27, 2002
votes: 0

Today, our graphics designer reported she had difficulties migrating an existing Fireworks file into MX. She said that the way the two programs handled data didn't seem entirely cross-compatible. Now, this might be an MX issue or an early-adpopter issue, I'm not sure.

Has anyone else seen a similar backwards compatibility issue with Fireworks MX?

5:56 am on May 7, 2002 (gmt 0)

Preferred Member

10+ Year Member

joined:Sept 20, 2001
votes: 0

Will give it a try, I am a fan of Fireworks (though I use photoshop for some tasks). It is still a beta.
6:33 am on May 7, 2002 (gmt 0)

Full Member from GB 

10+ Year Member

joined:Oct 16, 2001
votes: 0

So far I've downloaded DWMX, Fireworks MX and Flash MX.

In using Fireworks MX however I haven't seen any fantastic new standalone features which would make the upgrade a must, but the integration between Flash and Dreamweaver is quite good now.

Download and have a play around with it before you go out and buy it, and like SmallTime said it is still the beta version. The license runs out on the 8th June, but once final version is released you'll get another 30 days to trial it.

The one complaint I have about it is the shortcut icons. Flash is using a big red F and Fireworks is a small yellow fw, I see a red F and think "fireworks" everytime.....