Welcome to WebmasterWorld Guest from 23.20.110.176

Forum Moderators: not2easy

Message Too Old, No Replies

Text Links or Buttons

Use buttons and increase keyword density?

     
7:14 pm on Oct 3, 2001 (gmt 0)

Preferred Member

10+ Year Member

joined:Sept 7, 2001
posts:608
votes: 0


I recently switched links off of one of my homepages from text to jpg buttons. I saw a marked improvement in search engine rankings. I suppose this is because there was now less text on the page so the keyword density was higher. My sites are dynamic so its a lot more trouble to do buttons... Is it worth it and what is everybody else using?
7:19 pm on Oct 3, 2001 (gmt 0)

Senior Member

WebmasterWorld Senior Member agerhart is a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member

joined:Mar 29, 2001
posts:2945
votes: 0


That is an odd result......text links are good to use as the spiders can follow the links to the other pages, as well as having SEO importance
7:25 pm on Oct 3, 2001 (gmt 0)

Senior Member

WebmasterWorld Senior Member macguru is a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member

joined:Dec 30, 2000
posts:3300
votes: 0


Hi wingslevel,

Odd to me too, but every Web site is some other planet. Possible your web site had too much text.
Some spiders dont do overtime.

Some balanced approach is needed for every and each SE. Too much is too little for some, and food is poison for others.

I am surprised about overall sucess from such change.

7:26 pm on Oct 3, 2001 (gmt 0)

Senior Member

WebmasterWorld Senior Member mivox is a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member

joined:Dec 6, 2000
posts:3928
votes: 0


Most (if not all) spiders would be able to follow button links also...

<a href=><imc src=></a> -VS- <a href=>text link</a>

It's not very different from a coding/functional perspective. The <a href=> URL is the only part the spider NEEDS to follow.

That said, I don't see why switching from one to another style of link would make a drastic difference in ranking.

I use both types of links on most sites... Images for links which tend to be identical throughout the entire site (major navigation), text for links/navigation that tend to change from one page to the next. That way, I can have "nice looking" major links, without really increasing load time (since the browser can cache the buttons on the first pageview).

7:28 pm on Oct 3, 2001 (gmt 0)

Preferred Member

10+ Year Member

joined:Sept 7, 2001
posts:608
votes: 0


The spiders can follow the links off of buttons as easily as they can follow text links, can't they? I just checked and the site that I changed did get deep spidered by google and fast.

As far as seo importance I am wondering if the buttons might be better. For example, you have a sporting goods site....your keyword for your home page is sporting goods...but you have 15 links off of this page to baseball equip., hockey equip. etc....these links would dilute your main keyword of sporting goods if they were text.

7:32 pm on Oct 3, 2001 (gmt 0)

Senior Member

WebmasterWorld Senior Member agerhart is a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member

joined:Mar 29, 2001
posts:2945
votes: 0


these links would dilute your main keyword of sporting goods if they were text.

Maybe....but they would strengthen the pages that were being linked to.......catch 22

10:11 pm on Oct 3, 2001 (gmt 0)

Senior Member

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member

joined:Mar 6, 2001
posts:917
votes: 0


that's been my reason for relying entirely on text links...what you have to do is choose the words carefully

with the example of the sporting goods site I would have though sporting goods was a prety poor choice of keyword...I'd be much more likely to search for equipment fora particular sport...so the text links would be far better

8:29 am on Oct 4, 2001 (gmt 0)

Preferred Member

10+ Year Member

joined:Sept 24, 2001
posts:562
votes: 0


Could it be because an image link gives you the opportunity to include the <ALT> tag also