Welcome to WebmasterWorld Guest from 188.8.131.52
Google recently indexed my website. If I put site:mysite.com in google, I see a list of the pages in my website, that were indexed by google.
But here's a problem. Google shows the navigation links in the menu of my website as the description of the pages in the search results. How should I fix this? Should I add a meta description tag to my website?
Another thing is, my site will be changing very often. Do I have to add to add anything to my meta tags so the robot crawls my site again in a week or will it do that automatically? If I don't anything, how often does the bot crawl the sites by default?
In fact you described to a tee what shows up on a site: search for one of my sites. Instead of the unique meta descriptions, I'm seeing the navigation links and stuff like "page 1 of 2" showing up for every URL of the site, with the result that Googlebot seems to think every page is the same and the site's gone supplemental.
This is a four-year old site which used to rank well and show unique meta descriptions for each page. Not amused Google. :(
Recently, meta descriptions have become very important to Google; pages with none are often dropped; pages with non-unique descriptions are made supplementary. I believe malachite's problem is a different one.
For example, no-one (except a webmaster) searches for 'domain.com', so looking at that serp will not give you a clue as to what the 'typical searcher' is seeing.
Descriptions should reflect the page content, include rlevant key words, for two reasons:
1. Google likes it that way, and a happy Google smiles on you - like it or lump it :)
2. The text that appears in the serps depends 80%* on the search term - if the meta description it, then the meta description is likely to be used. If not, then it is most unlikely to be used.
20%* is down to which datacenter the search utilized - some may prefer the ODP description (where there is one), one or two may ignore both.
*Percentages are speculative; contents may settle during transit.
If I put the page content the first thing in the source code, but use CSS to display the menu on the top (e.g a human will see the menu at the top but a bot will see the content first), will it have any effect on boosting my rankings?
All I'm saying is that in common with several other posters throughout this forum, I'm seeing odd stuff in the results.
I'd just like to know why Google, which used to like and display the unique meta-tags each page has, has suddenly started ignoring these and replacing them with navigation links? If meta-descriptions are *so* important to Google, why has it stopped showing them? It's been using them for 4 years :o
I suspect that they are experimenting on several fronts, which is worrying, but we'll see.
But I also strongly suspect that Google is deliberately working against 'webmaster searches'; I'd certainly only worry about 'bad serps' after a keyword search, not after a domain search.
This is exactly the way I remember it used to be, quite some time ago (a year or two?). If descriptions have been behaving differently lately, perhaps Google simply changed them back. Under these "rules," I wouldn't expect a "site:" search to show meta descriptions, because it doesn't search on specific words, so there's nothing to match on.
when i worked for a mid sized newspaper, month after month, the top searches were for the domain name or variations of it. people type into search engine boxes like it was the address bar.Well, you learn something new every day! Thanks!
But that's still not an issue here - such 'searchers' know what they want, and so will click on the site they chose, regardless of the detail.
Someone who is genuinely 'searching' - ie has not already made up their mind, is pretty unlikely to type a domain name; a key word or phrase is the norm, and so i still believe those seacrhes are the ones the matter.
The reason I make this distinction is simply that many folk do not have their domain name either in their description or in the ODP description, so searching for it often gets a very different result compared to a 'genuine' search.