Welcome to WebmasterWorld Guest from 54.196.208.6

Message Too Old, No Replies

Somethings Up Right Now! -- 30 domains just went "home page only"

     
10:01 pm on May 2, 2006 (gmt 0)

Junior Member

10+ Year Member

joined:Jan 22, 2005
posts:104
votes: 0


All of my websites (30 of them) now show only the homepage when doing a site:www.domain.com .....

This just happenned within the last hour. Previously had thousands of sup's and regular pages.

2:37 pm on May 6, 2006 (gmt 0)

Junior Member

10+ Year Member

joined:Dec 14, 2004
posts:199
votes: 0


On 64.233.167.104 I did a search for a prescription drug and I noticed something new (to me anyway):

Refine results for "search term":
Drug uses Research papers From medical establishment
Side effects News For health professionals

Its something Yahoo does with the "Also try:"

2:59 pm on May 6, 2006 (gmt 0)

Junior Member

10+ Year Member

joined:Dec 14, 2004
posts:199
votes: 0


I noticed that Google added "refinements" on 64.233.167.104. It searches using a "keyword more:drug_uses". I see it only for prescription drugs. Is it a new or old thing?
3:01 pm on May 6, 2006 (gmt 0)

Full Member

10+ Year Member

joined:Feb 24, 2002
posts:225
votes: 0


I am seeing the results that were previous on AOL migrate across to Google.com, are others seeing the same thing? I must say that these results look the cleanest I have seen Google in years.
3:11 pm on May 6, 2006 (gmt 0)

Junior Member

10+ Year Member

joined:Dec 14, 2004
posts:199
votes: 0


Alby,
What's your google.com IP?
3:29 pm on May 6, 2006 (gmt 0)

Senior Member

WebmasterWorld Senior Member powdork is a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member

joined:Sept 13, 2002
posts:3346
votes: 0


My homepage is missing on 64.233.167.104. No worries though. That's what makes dances so much fun.
3:33 pm on May 6, 2006 (gmt 0)

Full Member

10+ Year Member

joined:Oct 6, 2004
posts:281
votes: 0


I've been getting the clean results all day long today.

Hope it sticks.

4:47 pm on May 6, 2006 (gmt 0)

Senior Member

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member

joined:Jan 22, 2002
posts:959
votes: 0


Oh dear... Makes me glad I stopped looking at the SERPS a while ago when I see results like this! Still, could be worse...erm...
6:18 pm on May 6, 2006 (gmt 0)

Senior Member

WebmasterWorld Senior Member g1smd is a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month

joined:July 3, 2002
posts:18903
votes: 0


Big changes today...

For the last few days, on the "experimental" DC, the erroneous search that previously returned 900 vague supplemental results (that didn't match the search query) instead of just a few dozen relevant supplemental results (for deleted pages and expired domains), occasionally returned zero results - which is the correct result if Google ever cleaned up the old supplementals - for a phone number that has been completely removed from the web during the last few years.

Today, many DCs return zero results every time for this and several other similar queries for stuff that Google should have cleaned up long ago.

Now, is this a DC that has been cleaned up of old Supplemental Results, or is it a DC that has the Supplemental data missing and Google is going to add it back in again, in the next few days?

Time will tell.

.

A large website whose domain expired two weeks ago, had 12 000 pages listed, many of them supplemental for the last few years. The root shows a "domain expired" message. All other pages are gone from the site.

Google reindexed the site and overnight the number of listed pages has been reduced to under 100 on the "experimental" DC. It seems like Google is aggressively throwing away old data, whereas before they would have held on to it for years and years...

On the old "normal" DCs, Google still shows 12 000 pages listed.

.

Is this the "big cleanup" started, or just some glitch?

7:49 pm on May 6, 2006 (gmt 0)

Senior Member

WebmasterWorld Senior Member steveb is a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member

joined:June 20, 2002
posts:4652
votes: 0


LOL, I hadn't thought of that. Seeing progress could actually be a glitch. Now that is scary.

Still, the first really hopeful signs in two years.

8:54 pm on May 6, 2006 (gmt 0)

Junior Member

10+ Year Member

joined:Feb 9, 2006
posts:103
votes: 0


My banned domain is back after a 14 month penalty. Cool.
9:00 pm on May 6, 2006 (gmt 0)

Senior Member

WebmasterWorld Senior Member g1smd is a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month

joined:July 3, 2002
posts:18903
votes: 0


In which set of results?

BigDaddy "A", BigDaddy "B", or the "experimental" stuff?

9:10 pm on May 6, 2006 (gmt 0)

Junior Member

10+ Year Member

joined:Feb 9, 2006
posts:103
votes: 0


It's back on all datacenters. Maybe my re-inclusion isn't related to what you're watching right now.
9:19 pm on May 6, 2006 (gmt 0)

Senior Member

WebmasterWorld Senior Member g1smd is a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month

joined:July 3, 2002
posts:18903
votes: 0


That observation is important.

Some changes are only happening on some DCs.

Other changes are happening on all DCs.

4:15 am on May 7, 2006 (gmt 0)

Junior Member

5+ Year Member

joined:May 7, 2006
posts:60
votes: 0


Searching for a phrase that's pretty specific to my site I find archaic results (defunct urls, etc.) from these DCs:

64.233.161.107, 64.233.161.147, 64.233.179.99, 64.233.179.104, 216.239.37.99, 216.239.39.99, 64.233.161.99, 64.233.161.104, 216.239.39.104, 216.239.37.104, 64.233.179.107, 72.14.207.107, 216.239.37.107, 216.239.39.107

And streamed down results that find ONLY my page here:

64.233.171.99, 64.233.171.104, 64.233.171.107, 64.233.171.147, 64.233.185.99, 64.233.185.104, 64.233.187.99. 64.233.187.104, 64.233.189.104, 216.239.53.99, 216.239.57.99, 66.102.7.99, 72.14.203.99, 72.14.203.104, 72.14.203.107, 72.14.207.99, 72.14.207.104, 72.14.207.107, 64.233.167.99, 64.233.167.104, 216.239.63.104, 216.239.53.104, 66.102.7.104, 216.239.57.104, 216.239.53.107, 216.239.57.107, 16.239.57.147, 66.102.7.147, 64.233.167.147

These appear to show in-between results:

64.233.183.99, 64.233.183.104, 216.239.59.99, 66.102.11.99, 66.102.9.99, 216.239.59.104, 66.102.11.104, 66.102.9.104, 64.233.183.107, 66.102.9.107, 216.239.59.107, 216.239.59.147

I don't think Google's broken -- I think this is an intentional purge. I'm a little bummed about it because they are crawling a lot of my pages and then withholding them from results for reasons unknown to me (they are especially withholding newer pages with unique content). I guess all I can do is try to improve my site and hope for incremental improvements over time.

5:43 am on May 7, 2006 (gmt 0)

Preferred Member

10+ Year Member

joined:Feb 3, 2004
posts:508
votes: 0


i have noticed the same thing for many websites, but it keeps on coming back to original numbers after a while
12:15 pm on May 7, 2006 (gmt 0)

Senior Member

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member

joined:Nov 12, 2003
posts:1070
votes: 0


I noticed things have been quiet over the weekend as far as the update is concerned. The new results have been stuck at 23 to 25 datacenters for 48 hours now. Hopefully Google is not having second thoughts.
10:28 pm on May 7, 2006 (gmt 0)

Senior Member

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member

joined:June 15, 2003
posts:2395
votes: 0


I happened to post this in the wrong thread, so I'll try here:

Has anybody considered that it may be the "site:" command that has gone AWOL, and not the index?

(like the "link:" command did some time back)

---
And by the way, I feel like dancing...

10:39 pm on May 7, 2006 (gmt 0)

New User

10+ Year Member

joined:Feb 8, 2006
posts:40
votes: 0


Claus is right.

A search for

site:http://www.mydomain.com

returns 107 results

A search for

site:http://www.mydomain.com -http://www.mydomain.com/subdomain

returns 2060 results

So it seems the 'minus' operator is actually adding pages.

Too screwy. I might check again in a weeks time.

11:04 pm on May 7, 2006 (gmt 0)

Junior Member

5+ Year Member

joined:Mar 23, 2006
posts:88
votes: 0


No. Claus is wrong.

It is definately not the "site:" command that's gone wrong. The pages are missing from the index.

11:09 pm on May 7, 2006 (gmt 0)

Senior Member

WebmasterWorld Senior Member g1smd is a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month

joined:July 3, 2002
posts:18903
votes: 0


I see the same results for site:domain.com and inurl:domain.com wherever I look, so I do not think the site command is broken.

However I do see things like 3500 pages in BD and 30 in "experimental" DC. The "experimental" DC now has two versions, and one seems to have dropped all Supplemental Results from before 2005 June.

1:05 am on May 8, 2006 (gmt 0)

Senior Member

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member

joined:June 15, 2003
posts:2395
votes: 0


Cool, I don't mind being wrong every now and then :)
5:07 am on May 8, 2006 (gmt 0)

New User

10+ Year Member

joined:Feb 8, 2006
posts:40
votes: 0


Claus, you are NOT wrong

A search for another of my sites revealed:

"Your search - site:myotherdomain.com - did not match any documents."

However upon checking my logs I am getting Google referrals for the site. Checking Google, the site appears in the SERPs for certain searches but only returns Supplemental results (all pages are supplemental for this site!).

So as far as I can see the site: command does not include supps, only pages from the main index.

8:14 pm on May 8, 2006 (gmt 0)

Senior Member

WebmasterWorld Senior Member g1smd is a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month

joined:July 3, 2002
posts:18903
votes: 0


Hmm, GoogleGuy has posted that some Supplemental Results are missing from the site: command:
[webmasterworld.com...]
9:37 pm on May 10, 2006 (gmt 0)

Senior Member

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member

joined:June 15, 2003
posts:2395
votes: 0


Ah, so not only was I wrong, I was wrong about being wrong ;)

Nice find g1smd - so, we have confirmation that the "site:" search does not work like (it should, or) we would like it to.

So what we have here are -- apparently -- some (supplemental) pages that are not being counted as part of the site on which they are hosted... In other words, the link between page and site has been broken.

9:51 pm on May 10, 2006 (gmt 0)

Junior Member

5+ Year Member

joined:Mar 23, 2006
posts:88
votes: 0


No. It's still wrong I'm afraid. This still has nothing whatsoever to do with the missing pages problem.

It is not uncommon for a "site:" search to occasionaly return "No results". I know because I am monitoring this stuff quite carefuly at the moment. Bear in mind that a datacentre is actually a large cluster of machines. When a datacentre is in flux, you will get wildly different results from it from one second to the next as your requests are handled by the different machines in the cluster. This will happen for a short period and then settle down. During this period, you will often get "no results" for a "site:" search from some of the machines in the cluster.

10:26 pm on May 10, 2006 (gmt 0)

Senior Member

WebmasterWorld Senior Member g1smd is a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month

joined:July 3, 2002
posts:18903
votes: 0


There are "multiple" problems.

Some only show in specific datacentres. Others are global.

This 176 message thread spans 6 pages: 176