Welcome to WebmasterWorld Guest from 188.8.131.52
I am creating a shareware (thereby "commercial") program that can in general analyze a website. So far, so good, none of it involves Google.
However... To be "overall" competitive I need at least some sort of position checking. Again, my program may (or may not) outshine all competitors out there with other features... But if I have zero position checking... Well, you get the idea.
I would be more than happy with e.g. either just parsing the first page from Google results (e.g. a page with
50 results) or using the WebAPI.
I would also be happy to include other sorts of limits. (e.g. NO concurrent requests - and enforce small "sleep/idle" periods etc.)
I am trying to create an all-around program for those small IT professionals shops that do all sorts of different work for their (local) clients. I am not up to "deep-dig" Google. I am also not in any way helping/promoting black-hat stuff in the software. (or anywhere else.)
All I would like to do (without getting de-indexed, sued, annihilated from face of earth *G*) is some simple position checking within first results page.
Also, how is "automated queries" defined? Would it be ok to have user enter/select a few phrases, retrieve google output (first results page for each phrase), and analyze HTML for website positions?
Does anyone know / have experience with if Google accepts non-abusive usage? (As I would prefer not to have my
entire website de-indexed, hehe.)
I have no idea if I am being an idiot asking this... As I have no search engine contacts that can tell me :-)
[edited by: engine at 3:00 pm (utc) on Feb. 8, 2006]
[edit reason] formatting [/edit]
Are you talking about a web-based application? Is that your concern? The ones I am thinking of are pc based.
joined:June 11, 2005
Personal and legitimate uses only
The Google Web APIs service is made available to you for your personal, non-commercial use only (at home or
If you are interested in doing anything different than the foregoing, you must first obtain Google's written consent. If you fail to do so, Google reserves the right to take legal action.
Oh... And yes, I HAVE tryed asking. However, they just completely ignored me... (the autoresponse email says they have closed for all new commercial applications.)
Anyways, I have researched the matter... I believe it is possible to make a /generic/ scraper which users themselves can configure.
I believe I can enforce "fair use" by:
* Enforcing minimum "idle pauses" between queries and page requests.
* Enforcing maximum page/results limit. For normal position checking, top 100 or 200 should be enough. (1-2 pages * 100 items.)
I can also (in my generic configuration files) allow for more restrictions.
In that way I will "side-step" most troubles. But I hate the situation. Dozens and yet dozens of "high-profile" well-known commercial web and software tools are allowed to use WebAPI / query Google in other (old) ways. It just totally annoys me. I can see myself making great tools (heh), but I seem to be tied down in ways others are not.
So my conclusion is: Either Google is supporting some "elite" hardcore SEO companies (thereby skewing the market for the small fish) making it impossible to enter.
They are accepting "fair use" (it is the webmasters websites that provide the content in first place - only fair if they are allowed to interact in some way.)
As Google likes? :-) "Web2" and "do not be evil" slogas, it only seems natural to believe it is the latter option.
*yawn* I have spent much time thinking and working myself around this. *sob*
Is it your impression that the wording
"The Google Web APIs service is" ...
is only meant for those getting a Google API key, and not software interacting with the with Google Web API service (using a user-supplied API key)?
In that case I've read it wrong all along.
Well, I suppose I will then offer both technologies then... My generic-old-school-postion-chekker (where I limit e.g. query parameters to maximum return e.g. top 200 results when reading the configuration files) and the WebAPI for Google.
The generic-old-school-postion-chekker will still be
useful for other/local engines and whatever.