Forum Moderators: Robert Charlton & goodroi
I believe that the type of the 301 redirection in your case is not important. Redirect as would be convenient for your customers.
However as a precaution, to avoid the duplicate content penalty, I would explicitly delete the redirected site form Google index (Google describes how to do it on their site). I would also disallow the robots to crawl the redirected site with robots.txt
Vadim.
Redirect as would be convenient for your customers.
However as a precaution, to avoid the duplicate content penalty, I would explicitly delete the redirected site form Google index (Google describes how to do it on their site). I would also disallow the robots to crawl the redirected site with robots.txt
Using Google's Remove URL tool doesn't actually remove URLs from their index, it merely hides them for six months. In six months those URLs will come back into the index.
Is it true also when you use "disallow" in robots.txt? I doubt it. I.e. Google may keep the URL in their inner index, but how can they punish for the content that the author required not to be found in Search Engines?
In any case I assumed that after 6 months the old server will either respond with 404 or, better, with 410. I believe that Google is clever enough not to punish for duplicate contents in such cases.
Vadim.
Indeed although site:example.com showed the same amount of pages as site:www.example.com they indeed had different pageranks.. Quite annoying since I never promoted example.com ..
<VirtualHost 127.0.0.1:80>
Servername example.com
# Serveralias example.com www.example.com
RewriteEngine On
RewriteRule ^(.*)$ http://www.example.com:80/$1 [R=301]
Hope that's that stuff sorted now ..