Forum Moderators: Robert Charlton & goodroi
If we are doing something wrong we would obviously appreciate any clue as to what that thing is. How big a deal could it be to tell us?
It gets worse. Fixing the problem and requesting reinclusion does not result in immediate reinstatement. I understand that reinstatement occurs after the expiration of some "punishment period". The length of the punishment period is a secret and apparently varies depending on the alleged "offense". A "fix something and see if that worked" approach therefore could take years so legitimate web site owners are forced into a "shotgun" approach in which they make multiple, expensive changes in the often futile hope that one of them will eventually get them reinstated.
Spammers have none of these problems. Domain names are cheap. A spammer can serve up the same (or nearly the same) information under 20 different domain names and get 20 times the exposure of a legitimate site. If Google eventually finds and bans some of these domains, more are easily added. Spammers don't have to worry about registered trademarks, brand recognition, business cards, print ads, etc. Google policy harasses legitimate site owners and has no effect on hard core spammers who are laughing all the way to the bank. Google should disclose specific reasons why a site has been delisted and discontinue the childish punishment period. Google's policy of treating legitimate web site owners as the enemy is creating spammers, not helping with the spam problem.
I have noticed that the quality of Google searches has been declining and there are ever more garbage sites popping up in high ranking results. Google seems to be gradually losing the spam war. I suspect they are putting most of their effort into diversifying into email, maps, video, etc.