Forum Moderators: Robert Charlton & goodroi
I couldn't find any case of linking or 302 redirects that might confuse the bot. These two sites aren't on the same theme, except if one site was about horses and the other zebras, and they are both animals, if you see my analogy.
However, they are both on the same IP address through a popular hosting company.
I submitted an explanation of the problem to google.com/support with the subject line of 'canonicalpage'; I dont' know if that will still work, but we'll see.
Has anyone else had a similar problem, and if so, what did you do? Is there a better way to notify Google?
Type in your browser the shared IP address that both sites are using. There should be no page, or some default page of your hosting company. In our case my customers site was shown. If the site of your client is popping up it is probably a configuration problem.
In Google, the page title, snippet and cache are that of my client's site, while the domain name is that of the other site. There is also an indented second result listing, which is actually from the proper site, not my client's. Checking today, The cache date is 7/15, while the indented result is cached 7/24.
No response from Google yet.
Do the sites each have their own unique domain names or are they using subdirectories? In the past, I've also seen Google combine two sites where two sites both used different subdirectories and but were on the same topic, like two different AOL users both writing about horses on their personal web space getting their sites merged in the serps.
In my case when the other site would get more links then my site would either not be in their SERPs or would show up as an indented listing after theirs. The longterm solution for me was to get my own domain name on a separate host. The short term solution was to get more one way authority links to my site so it showed up first in the serps.
As suggested, uou may also want to ask at the hosting company if they have been moving things around behind the scenes lately. It could be a technical issue at their end.
Perhaps your client would also benefit from paying extra to get a unique IP address with the same host or simply consider changing hosts.
Site B's home page has site A's home page in Google's cache.
Site A's home page has site C's home page in Google's cache.
Site D's contact page has site A's contact page in Google's cache.
I don't see any other misappropriated pages doing a site: command for sites A B or D. Site C is a store with more than 30,000 pages that I didn't check, obviously.
It looks like it might be time to order that dedicated IP address...