Welcome to WebmasterWorld Guest from 3.85.245.126

Forum Moderators: Robert Charlton & goodroi

Message Too Old, No Replies

Will syndicating my articles trip a duplicate filter/penalty

     
6:32 pm on Jun 21, 2005 (gmt 0)

Junior Member

10+ Year Member

joined:June 20, 2004
posts:158
votes: 0


I would like to allow people to publish my site's articles, so long as the linking information stays the same.

If copies of my articles end up getting posted around the internet, will this trip the duplicate filter?

I've heard recently that Google keeps the oldest version but is that accurate. In the past (pre-Florida) I had pages dropped that I created and another site outright cut-and-pasted onto their domain.

4:16 am on June 22, 2005 (gmt 0)

Senior Member

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member

joined:Jan 31, 2004
posts:710
votes: 0


Yes, this will set off the duplicate filter, the oldest duplicate version most likely will out rank the other web pages, but this can get you kicked out IF you have to MUCH duplicate content.
12:53 pm on June 22, 2005 (gmt 0)

Full Member

joined:Jan 12, 2004
posts:334
votes: 0


Does this also hold true for those that link to you? If they are all using the same text:

domainname.com - same text here at all sites that link to you.

Will that hurt anything on my end?
Thanks.

6:09 pm on June 22, 2005 (gmt 0)

Senior Member

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member

joined:Jan 31, 2004
posts:710
votes: 0


Clint,
If they have other text on the same page it should not be seen as duplicate content, but even if they do it won't hurt you in anyway.
12:51 am on June 23, 2005 (gmt 0)

Junior Member

10+ Year Member

joined:June 20, 2004
posts:158
votes: 0


Yes, this will set off the duplicate filter, the oldest duplicate version most likely will out rank the other web pages, but this can get you kicked out IF you have to MUCH duplicate content.

-------------------------------------------------

If that's true, then that is a Google flaw in my opinion. I can understand Google not wanting to index tons of duplicate content, but dropping pages from the original site is just bogus to me. If I'm a reputable website that syndicates content and 100,000 sites reprint my articles, my site/page should be seen as an authority, and it should not be dropped at all.

3:50 am on June 23, 2005 (gmt 0)

Full Member

10+ Year Member

joined:July 23, 2003
posts:228
votes: 0


The point of the web is to have people link to your content, not copy it. Google is acting correctly.
1:34 pm on June 23, 2005 (gmt 0)

Full Member

joined:Jan 12, 2004
posts:334
votes: 0


robotsdobetter:

Clint,
If they have other text on the same page it should not be seen as duplicate content, but even if they do it won't hurt you in anyway.

Thanks. Did you mean to say....."but even if they don't it won't hurt you in any way."?

1:47 pm on June 23, 2005 (gmt 0)

New User

10+ Year Member

joined:Oct 1, 2004
posts:27
votes: 0


What about the thousands of sites displaying many Reuters news articles every day e.g. Yahoo, Lycos, NY Times etc? It would be ridiculous to penalise these sites, unless its just the individual pages that get penalised as opposed to a site-wide ban.
1:55 pm on June 23, 2005 (gmt 0)

Junior Member

10+ Year Member

joined:Feb 29, 2004
posts:163
votes: 0


<<<What about the thousands of sites displaying many Reuters news articles every day e.g. Yahoo, Lycos, NY Times etc? It would be ridiculous to penalise these sites, unless its just the individual pages that get penalised as opposed to a site-wide ban>>>

This is exactly what I'm seeing on my end. I post press-releases on their own separate pages from organizations in my area. Have done so for a long time now.

Those individual pages do seem to suffer now, whereas the rest of my site will still do well...okay, ok, aside from the problems Bourbon's brought to my front door.

5:13 pm on June 23, 2005 (gmt 0)

Senior Member from MY 

WebmasterWorld Senior Member vincevincevince is a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member

joined:Apr 1, 2003
posts:4847
votes: 0


Google has to only show one copy. No user wants to see two copies of the same thing. And it decides the most important copy is the best ranked one. I think that's pretty simple!
5:23 pm on June 23, 2005 (gmt 0)

Senior Member

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member

joined:Mar 19, 2003
posts:804
votes: 0


"And it decides the most important copy is the best ranked one. I think that's pretty simple!"

Precisely correct, but absolutely wrong.

5:26 pm on June 23, 2005 (gmt 0)

Junior Member

10+ Year Member

joined:Feb 29, 2004
posts:163
votes: 0


<<Google has to only show one copy.>>

I'd agree

<<No user wants to see two copies of the same thing.>>

Unless of course they don't have easy access to the original because of the SEs crappy SERPs or because the originating organization simply isn't that well known or rather, as popular as my own site might be. Which is why organizations come to me to post their stuff. I don't do it for my own benefit but for theirs.

<<I think that's pretty simple!>>

not as simple as you might have yourself believe.

6:00 pm on June 23, 2005 (gmt 0)

Preferred Member

10+ Year Member

joined:Aug 27, 2003
posts:570
votes: 0


"The point of the web is to have people link to your content, not copy it. Google is acting correctly."

Since when?

Look, there is great value with the sharing/syndication of conent and articles(as you put it "copying it") from stock quotes, weather, news, rss feeds, open source tools/scripts, AWS, heck Wordtracker lets people tap into their database... It is good for advertising for you and gives exposure to your brand (so you don't have to rely on stupid search engines). You let them use the information as payment they link to you. It is an easy cost effective way to advertise you business.

(You can syndicate complete articles or just a list of articles where they click to your site to read.)

8:16 pm on June 23, 2005 (gmt 0)

Senior Member

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member

joined:Jan 31, 2004
posts:710
votes: 0


Thanks. Did you mean to say....."but even if they don't it won't hurt you in any way."?
Yes, that's what I was saying, sorry.
3:16 am on June 24, 2005 (gmt 0)

Full Member

joined:Jan 12, 2004
posts:334
votes: 0


Thanks. ;)