Welcome to WebmasterWorld Guest from 54.162.239.134

Forum Moderators: phranque

Message Too Old, No Replies

AOL Caching and board here.

     
5:33 am on Sep 8, 2000 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Administrator brett_tabke is a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



I have been reading in depth on aol's site about caching and browsers. There seems to be a problem with people from AOL being able to see updated posts here throughout the day. AOL is only revalidating and caching a page only once every 24 hours. Can anyone dispute this?

I could turn on 'Pragma: no cache', but that would force a reload on every page AOL'ers request (not good).

The problem is our usage of dynamically generated .htm files. AOL is fully caching them. Does anyone know of a way I can get AOL to do a check for 'last modified' times? I want them to be able to cache a file, I just want them to check if it has been modified on every request.

Thank you.

5:40 am on Sep 8, 2000 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member rcjordan is a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member



>The problem is our usage of dynamically generated .htm
How about sticking a random number after the .htm extension when the thread is modified? A spin on the way we break banner cache.
2:22 pm on Sep 8, 2000 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Brett, I think you could do this by setting HTTP Headers correctly, set EXPIRES header to low value, and then make sure the LAST-MODIFIED is set correctly whenever new message is added to the thread.
Typical Proxy behaviour is to look at EXPIRES header of cached page, if it is pass expiration it will send header request to the server to check LAST-MODIFIED, it then compares cached LAST-MODIFIED to newly retrieved LAST-MODIFIED if they are the same cached page is served, if not a full html reqest is send and new page is retrieved, served and put in cache.
2:29 pm on Sep 8, 2000 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Administrator brett_tabke is a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



That is the route I guess Pete. I was hoping for another solution. I am not fond of the expires header. I wonder what kind of time frame I should think about? 10mins? Will it even do any good. I bet they ignore anything under an hour and just repull the page every time. I don't want to do that for the whole board and will target aol.
 

Featured Threads

Hot Threads This Week

Hot Threads This Month