Forum Moderators: phranque
I wasn't sure why I suddenly started receiving these failure notices, until I remembered I had changed one of my server's hostname yesterday. I had to, because I had it set on a domain that wasn't even on the server anymore - oops - which is probably why i never received these emails before).
Now, shall I reject, on all domains, all e-mail that is sent to non-existent addresses, instead of sending bounce messages, or is there a better way?
Hi. This is the qmail-send program at plesk.**myserverdomain**.com.
I tried to deliver a bounce message to this address, but the bounce bounced!<anonymous@plesk.**myserverdomain**.com>:
Sorry, no mailbox here by that name. (#5.1.1)--- Below this line is the original bounce.
Return-Path: <>
Received: (qmail 11190 invoked for bounce); 13 Apr 2006 21:12:16 -0000
Date: 13 Apr 2006 21:12:16 -0000
From: MAILER-DAEMON@plesk.**myserverdomain**.com
To: anonymous@plesk.**myserverdomain**.com
Subject: failure noticeHi. This is the qmail-send program at plesk.**myserverdomain**.com.
I'm afraid I wasn't able to deliver your message to the following addresses.
This is a permanent error; I've given up. Sorry it didn't work out.<******@***.***>:
***.**.**.* does not like recipient.
Remote host said: 550 5.1.1 unknown or illegal alias: ******@***.***
Giving up on ***.**.**.*.--- Below this line is a copy of the message.
Return-Path: <anonymous@plesk.**myserverdomain**.com>
Received: (qmail 11187 invoked by uid 10008); 13 Apr 2006 21:12:11 -0000
Date: 13 Apr 2006 21:12:11 -0000
<20060413211211.11186.qmail@plesk.**myserverdomain**.com>
To: ******@***.***
From: ****@****.***
Subject: ****<ORIGINAL EMAIL TEXT>
I'm confused.
Not a lot of money, but I would think that it is in the hosts best interest to do this by default.
What? They actually wanted to charge you money for something they should be doing by default? Yikes! $5.00 is not a whole lot of money but if you take that and multiply it by 3,000 sites, it adds up. :(
It takes about 10 seconds to add the SPF file.
From my perspective, they should be doing this by default. If they don't then email spoofing may become a vulnerability. Not only that, but with recent changes at AOL, Hotmail and larger ISPs, not having an SPF may cause your mail to not reach those recipients.
EOC - Email Optimization Consultant
[webmasterworld.com...]
v=spf1 a mx include:myisp.com ~all
So far no changes in the amount of failure notices received. I'm considering creating one catch-all e-mail address for all domains, and just have everything dumped in there.