Welcome to WebmasterWorld Guest from 107.20.108.136

Forum Moderators: phranque

Message Too Old, No Replies

Block users by geographical location?

Is this possible, and is it ethical?

     
8:29 am on Apr 4, 2001 (gmt 0)

Preferred Member from ES 

10+ Year Member

joined:Feb 8, 2001
posts:582
votes: 0


A client, for genuine reasons, wants to block US users from reaching his site.

I read it was possible to block users by IP using the ht access file..

So next question is, can you block a range of users, and do IP addresses give you any geographical indication?

And, lastly, would this be ethical?

Thanks.

10:00 pm on Apr 4, 2001 (gmt 0)

Senior Member

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member

joined:Sept 21, 1999
posts:2141
votes: 0


Blocking by DNS name would likely be substantially easier since most non-US domain names end in a country code. If you were to block .com, .edu, .org, and .us you'd likely have most of the US visitors. Another approach might be to only allow visitors from selected country codes. There is some overlap, overseas people surfing via US hosts and vice versa. Blocking by IPs is probably impractical simply due to the large number of IPs you would need to identify and filter for. Any of these appraoches can be implemented in the .htaccess file.

I don't see an ethical question at all. A site that advertizes for a mail order business that only services Europe, for example, may wisely choose not to allow visitors from the US to avoid international orders/shipping costs. The person that builds a site and pays the server fees has the right to exclude any visitors he chooses.

10:07 pm on Apr 4, 2001 (gmt 0)

Senior Member

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member

joined:July 6, 2000
posts:904
votes: 0


> for genuine reasons, wants to block US users

If you don't mind me asking, what are the reasons? Would it not be better to sell the US traffic on to someone else through an affiliate scheme or whatever (if possible)?

10:10 pm on Apr 4, 2001 (gmt 0)

Preferred Member from ES 

10+ Year Member

joined:Feb 8, 2001
posts:582
votes: 0


A fine idea!! Some further discussion required...

Cheers fella.

10:12 pm on Apr 4, 2001 (gmt 0)

Senior Member

WebmasterWorld Senior Member mivox is a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member

joined:Dec 6, 2000
posts:3928
votes: 0


I don't see an ethical problem, but I see big logistic problems... There's no way to determine who's coming from where all the time. If you block .com/.org/.net visitors, you'll block a lot of non-us folks too. Not to mention, I know our site gets a significant handful of visitors from unresolved IPs, which means you'd also be allowing some US visitors at the same time.

I don't see any reason why you *shouldn't* do it... but I don't see any really effective way that you *could* do it either.

10:22 pm on Apr 4, 2001 (gmt 0)

Senior Member

WebmasterWorld Senior Member rcjordan is a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member

joined:Apr 22, 2000
posts:9138
votes: 0


I see no problem on the ethics side, but I agree with mivox to a large degree. I believe there would be a significant overkill by restricting access.
10:27 pm on Apr 4, 2001 (gmt 0)

Senior Member

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member

joined:July 6, 2000
posts:904
votes: 0


How do Lycos, Google etc redirect by geography/IP? There's obviously some way of doing it - I'm having dark ideas about transferring non-UK visitors direct to my merchants without worrying about them having to click on a banner... hmm...
11:44 am on Apr 12, 2001 (gmt 0)

Preferred Member

10+ Year Member

joined:Feb 21, 2001
posts:419
votes: 0


Don't forget people aren't always who they appear to be, I might not be from the US but there for a day on business, or more likely I might be using a proxy in the US (or may be using a corporate WAN that breaks out to the internet from the US even though I am in the UK).
These situations wont be common but its worth thinking about.
1:29 pm on Apr 12, 2001 (gmt 0)

Preferred Member from ES 

10+ Year Member

joined:Feb 8, 2001
posts:582
votes: 0


I think we're going to go with sugarkanes affilliate idea - much more sensible!

Yes, for sure, there would be somebody blocked that shouldn't be etc etc not worth the bother I don't think...

Thankyou everybody

 

Join The Conversation

Moderators and Top Contributors

Hot Threads This Week

Featured Threads

Free SEO Tools

Hire Expert Members