Forum Moderators: phranque
Yesterday another unknown site showed up when I accessed my site. I reported the issue to the NOC. After four hours (!) my site was showing up again.
Later the same day the same thing happened, my site was gone and replaced by the other site.
The "explanation" from the NOC:
Another customer with a plesk server on the same C class net deleted by error his range of IP addresses, so he retyped them in his control panel. He mistyped one to be my IP. So when he added it, my site stopped working and the NOC's routers re-rerouted the IP to his server. The flaw was is the router, they say, both of us use the same router and in the same class C net.
After 4 hours, when the DNS TTL expired, the router somehow discovered the error and fixed it. That was the first incident. As such, I was hijacked 4 hours.
The next incident, the guy must have tried to use his IP or something, and he re-hijacked by error the IP.
The server re-asked control of the IP to the router, and got it. Then the guy was p*ssed off beacuse his server was not working again and my site was showing up instead. So he called the NOC to complain his server was not working. They immediately corrected the IP on his server.
The NOC has now reloaded our IP lists. The NOC tells me that no clients have access to edit their IP list anylonger. The NOC says they will bind/check the MAC address associated with every IP, and this will never happen again, as it now reserves an IP to a specific MAC address. They tell me that this NEVER happened to any of the techs before.
I asked for an e-mail from them, explaining the situation,
they said that they don't do that, because of the liablity laws in the USA. They says this is not a situation they could anticipate, this was not their fault, and they tried their best to solve it.
Is this is a known security flaw?
Have you heard about this issue before, or have I been taken for a ride here?
if you couldn't reach your IP on the second incident <that rules out hijacking> and leads me to believe a NOC engineer blocked it.
Totally lame on their part. This would never happen on a properly configured network, they shouldn't use 255.255.255.0 in THEIR router unless they're giving a single customer the full range.