Forum Moderators: skibum

Message Too Old, No Replies

no banner ad bucks? will you pull the plug?

         

rcjordan

4:34 pm on Jun 26, 2000 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



from another thread, seems like a topic starter in this forum, besides I'd hate to have to close down Brett's posts for getting off topic ...

>Why work to ramp up someone else's site
>when you can ramp up your own

Does the DotComMorgue ring a bell? The site reaper could come calling for us too you know.

I keep looking at these ad numbers - it would make a preacher cuss on sunday. ....Something has to give soon. The current ad market is really getting scary to me. I kept thinking it would bounce back, but it hasn't. Course, I recall going through similar last summer too.

So, here's a question for all web publishers: IF/WHEN banner revenues dry up, will it cause you to pull the plug on your site?


Brett_Tabke

3:34 pm on Jun 27, 2000 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Administrator 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



Before that happens, I think there will be a mad scramble for affiliations first. But, I don't think net advertising will dry up. With Coke now saying its ok for you to advertise by virtue of their AOL deal, I think it will make a strong come back this fall.

rcjordan

5:06 pm on Jun 27, 2000 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



>I don't think net advertising will dry up

You and I are of like minds (that's why we've been hanging around doing this crap since 1995, right?), but I was hoping for some tear-jerking, gut-wrenching, soul-baring confessions from some of the other publishers out there.

Lurkers, what say ye? CAN YOU MAKE IT WITHOUT BANNER REVENUE? If so, how and why, si vous plait? We're not looking for your deepest and darkest trade secrets here, but some general insights might be invaluable. I'll start:

Why yes, rc, I can make it. I only started serving banners in 1999. It's less than one-third of the total revenue. The rest comes from geographically targeted sponsorships and data sales.

>there will be a mad scramble for affiliations
What kind? I think the vast majority of affiliate networks (in the traditional web sense of putting up a banner or button in return for CPC or commission) SUCK, and are not worth a webmaster's keystrokes.

rcjordan

6:15 pm on Aug 6, 2000 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



>what say ye? CAN YOU MAKE IT WITHOUT BANNER REVENUE?

I'm resurrecting this thread because, now several months into the banner revenue drought, I've recently seen signs that the answer for many publishers is 'NO!' --though the site owners are not yet giving up entirely and pulling the plug. Any comments?

NFFC

8:06 pm on Aug 6, 2000 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



>>what say ye? CAN YOU MAKE IT WITHOUT BANNER REVENUE?

In the UK certainly. It seems that more sites over here are e-commerce led and looking to sell something tangible as opposed to relying on ad revenue.

I may be wrong about this and would certainly love to hear from any UK/European posters/lurkers with experience in this area.

BTW check out this "typical" UK banner ad, you will need a very fast connection. ;)

[spartiate.co.uk ]


Edited by: NFFC

tedster

8:18 pm on Aug 6, 2000 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Wow, a 557K animation. That's close to the biggest file I've ever seen on a commercial site.

Brett_Tabke

3:17 pm on Aug 7, 2000 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Administrator 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



Well, I'm going for some of the big ecom and affiliate plunge here. Not going to jump in whole hog, but dip my toe in and see if it gets burned.

Having promoted ecom's for more people than I care to admit, I know pretty much all the issues involved. The question is always the same as offline, do you have quality product to sell? Let's see, that is buy low, sell high right?

rcjordan

3:32 pm on Aug 7, 2000 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



HMmmmm....
The worst may be yet to come. New numbers from e-commerce research firm BizRate.com show that online retail sales dropped 13 percent during the second quarter, while overall U.S. retail sales grew 9 percent. Those chilling figures, which BizRate attributed to fewer sales rather than smaller purchases, followed already dire predictions by several leading analysts that more Web stores will be out of business soon.
--Aug 07 When Toysmart Fell Apart [zdnet.com]

rcjordan

2:07 am on Sep 8, 2000 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



just got back from reading the latest howls of no-banner-revenue pain over in GHF, makes me want to bring this thread to the top again.... though I'm seeing signs among my competitors that they ARE indeed pulling the plug.

Whether they know it or not, many publishers are now deeply embroiled in a war of attrition.

rcjordan

5:41 pm on Oct 1, 2000 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



``They are trying very aggressively to move away from their traditional model,'' Corcoran said. ``They recognize that anyone who banks their future on banner advertising is in pretty bad shape.''

Yahoo battles . . . . . .the dot-com storms. Top portal looking to new services for revenue. -article here [mercurycenter.com]

DaveAtIFG

6:17 pm on Oct 1, 2000 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



RCJ - From the "ma and pa" webmaster's point of view:

My two little dotcoms (started on a shoestring and practical biz model, both profitable) have never had the traffic to make banner ads pay or, until recently, the revenue to afford to buy them. Carefully chosen affiliate programs have provided good income.

I've watched in amazement and disbelief at the kind of venture capital money that was thrown into startups, much of it in ads. As the Dotcom Morgue thread has shown, VC money is drying up, extravagent spending on ads will dry up as well... Affiliate programs based on a sound business model are the place to be...

My crystal ball clouds over again... :( Durn thing never has worked right...

Mike_Mackin

6:19 pm on Oct 1, 2000 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Just over 2 years ago I had a Healthcare Forums site.
My advertiser or sponsor was purchased by WebMD.
I lost the only revenue stream I had. Could not find another at that time.
So I sold ad space to myself. Banners led to an affiliate program that paid residuals.
It was a numbers game but it worked for me.

rcjordan

6:25 pm on Oct 1, 2000 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Pssst! The secret is in our "burn rates" --almost ZERO, but don't tell anyone.

re affiliates:
Yes, some sites can pull a nice revenue from SELECTED affiliate programs. There are several known to frequent these forums that make "a good living" from them. But for the general interest site with general interest traffic, I'd still say most affiliate programs aren't worth the keystrokes.

[note the dates on this thread, there's a bit of a timeline here, which partly accounts for why I occasionally reactivate it.]

Brett_Tabke

6:55 am on Oct 3, 2000 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Administrator 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



Well, I know I may be the exception here, but September was the first month my advertising revenue was more than seo revenue. It looks like it will be that way through the end of the year. No one is more pleasantly surprised than me. Most all of it was targeted ads; however, there was a great run the last couple weeks of stock RON ads too.

Drastic

5:49 pm on Oct 10, 2000 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Banner ads, pull the plug when dead? No! Change and adapt, that is the key to survival.

Things constantly change, you have to change with them to succeed. I am always seeing posts (another board) where a webmaster is complaining about the low CPMs, branding banners shown for CPC revenue, and trick/highly clickable banners given as CPM. Forget the CPM/CPC ad companies - find a targetted affiliate program for your audience and figure out how to make the most of it. Play with text ads, popups, different buttons/banners and their placement. You control the ads, you pick which ones work best for each page/location. Evaluate what you do, and make changes. You can be much more successful than letting the ad company do it. It takes more work, but you make more, and the ad company cut is gone. You also learn a lot in the process. Once you figure out your user demographic, the rest is easy.

I usually enjoy a $.10 to $.15 EPV (earnings per visitor.) I have never run the first banner ad on my site, and I think I can close to double my EPV over the next couple of weeks. My site is an extreme case of this, but this can be implemented on basically any site.

Now if I could only get my SEO skills up to par with my revenue skills, I would be set! ;)

rcjordan

8:53 pm on Oct 31, 2000 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



So, is this why Engage just launched interstitial? My guess is 'yes.'
Ads Fail to Click With Online Users [iht.com]

NFFC

6:15 pm on Nov 10, 2000 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Online ad industry buoyed by not-coms

"Dotcoms may be scrabbling for cash, but the online ad agencies aren't worried . As long as traditional offline companies keep discovering the Internet, they'll keep raking in the cash"

The Standard - Europe [europe.thestandard.com]

rcjordan

6:29 pm on Nov 10, 2000 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



This may be a case where Europe doesn't seem to be following in the (largely failed) course of web developments in the US. American not-coms just don't seem to trust the web yet. Could it be that the trillion-dollar losses in the stock markets have caused them to be overly cautious? I think so.

rcjordan

3:39 pm on Nov 13, 2000 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



"Even as dot-com revenue started to dry up, overall revenue from Internet advertising surpassed the $2 billion mark for the first six months of this year, giving a boost to information service sites. And market watchers say traditional advertisers are going to lead the sector out of its current gloom and doom.

But it may take a while.

Merrill Lynch analyst Henry Blodget says the hangover that has resulted from the pure-play "dot-com advertising binge" could last for months. The problem is that traditional advertisers aren't moving dollars online fast enough to offset the loss of dot-com dollars" -article here [zdnet.com]

rcjordan

6:20 pm on Dec 26, 2000 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



As we wrap up the year, the current evidence is that the lethal combination of no banner ads bucks, generally poor-to-very-poor affiliate performance, and the rise of pay-for-play in the SE's has wrought havoc on many websites, cutting revenue streams down to trickles.

This thread has survived longer than many web ventures, but looking back over it, I realize that I seriously underestimated how deeply online advertising -and primarily banners- had become "THE reason to be" on the web. And not just for small, independent publishers, either.

han solo

9:26 pm on Dec 26, 2000 (gmt 0)



I have thoroughly enjoyed reading this thread over the last months...what I find funny is the banner ad bucks drying up, and seo still so unkown, even among successful, educated, business people in the computer field. Though I guess it depends what circle you run in, here is an example from my holiday weekend.

A family friend asked what I did for a living, and I told him I work for an SEO company. He didn't know what that was, but at a party, he asked around. Of the 50 people he asked, only 2 responded, both high paid computer consultants. I'm not even sure if they understand what SEO currently is, but the low awareness level was surprising.

I think too many companies just saw the banners as the web vehicle, and starting throwing their money that way. After all, somebody had to fund Yahoo...and they seemed to make money, right?

And the number of meta tag optimization sites I've seen is still amazing...I wonder how many companies have bought those services, and then wondered why the traffic never came?

Well, just my 2 or 3 cents.

Cheers,

Han Solo

rcjordan

10:03 pm on Jan 22, 2001 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



OK, now I'm definitely seeing sites blinking out presumably because they can't cover the bandwidth charges and site maintenance. I was researching some basic tutorials and some sites that I remember as being content rich now return either 404's or the host's site splash page.

I expect to see affiliate programs ravaged next.

Brett_Tabke

1:52 am on Jan 23, 2001 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Administrator 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



The affiliate sell off is already happening. So is the big kickout from advertisers. I've talked to several people who've been kicked out of Flycast/engage and quite a few from Burst. They are starting to cull down to their profitable sites.

Drastic

7:39 am on Jan 24, 2001 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



moved post here [webmasterworld.com] (better fit)