Welcome to WebmasterWorld Guest from 54.166.180.246

Forum Moderators: martinibuster

Message Too Old, No Replies

AltaVista Spam Definition

     

Videoace

8:07 pm on Mar 31, 2000 (gmt 0)

Inactive Member
Account Expired

 
 


Has the time come to provide some real content to the Buddy Links pages? I'm concerned about the spam definition trotted out today by Alta. Take a look - Here.

I realize there are descriptions provided for each site, but is this sufficient? What about "pages whose primary intent is to redirect users to another page"? I don't want to be spooked, but I do want to be very careful.

9:19 pm on Mar 31, 2000 (gmt 0)

Administrator from US 

WebmasterWorld Administrator brett_tabke is a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month

joined:Sept 21, 1999
posts:38059
votes: 13


What do you suggest? What could we possibly add for content? That is the same spam definition they have always used. That is a verbatium copy of what is found elsewhere in their 'spam' files.