Forum Moderators: martinibuster
Based on the threads I have read I think that text links work better. You see back links serve two purposes, drive traffic to your site and/or create a backward link in increasing link popularity. Usually most SEO companies I have interacted with state that text links are actually better, I think a senior member could shed some more light on this.
JF
A graphic link contributes a vote, and it is generally held that alt text contributes to defining your website's relevance, but to a lesser extent (this isn't anything that can be said with one hundred percent assurance). I've seen instances where alt text within a site's graphic navigation helped push a site up in the ranks I'm sure there may be others who can testify that they tried it and it didn't help.
1) Not many agree to give graphic links, and link diversification is a key factor to reduce the risk.
2) Customer wise , graphic links catch more attention
{note:Image without alt text will do that good)
BTW, welcome to the world of S.Engines and WebmasterWorld.com
Enjoy
Aji
If you are aiming to increae your results for a certain key word/phrase, text links using that phrase as your anchor text may contribute more than graphic links. Of course, location of the link plays a big part in the effectiveness of the link. Just my two cents.
Especially for a brand new website waiting for SE traffic, speaking strictly about traffic and not link pop or anything else, graphic links might make more sense than a reciprocal or text link.
avi wilensky
[edited by: martinibuster at 7:49 pm (utc) on Feb. 11, 2005]
[edit reason] Please, no self promo in sigs. [/edit]
I have been doing a lot of banner exchanges recently with other sites, i know arent putting any alt image text on the banners, but they link back to me. Is this still good?
Each link is a vote and powers your site(page), each alt tag of an image link powers keywords mentioned in the alt tag.
Use Alt tag always
Aji