Forum Moderators: phranque
1) I'm sure you mean 'verbatim' rather than 'per batem'.
2) AFAIK, the law is silent on use of site names.
Let's say your site is bluewinky.com, and somebody registered bluewinky.net.
That's perfectly legitimate. Its up to you to register both domains if you want them.
I could register bluewinky.org if you or nobody else got there first.
3) Did the .net site copy your content? Now THAT is indeed an issue. -Larry
1) I'm sure you mean 'verbatim' rather than 'per batem'.
>Yse, was in a hurry and "Po'ed"
2) AFAIK, the law is silent on use of site names.
>Humm, thought there was some kind of law on copying names.
3) Did the .net site copy your content? Now THAT is indeed an issue. -Larry
>no but they both deal with the same kind of products.
The defense to be argued against you is that you had the oppertunity to buy that domain but didn't. You could just counter that with the fact that you can buy the same domain with I think now dosens of various extensions.
I'm not surprised there aren't any laws, the congress seems more concerned about micromanging the US and creating legal leaks for corporate scumbags instead of serving it's role in country intended to be a republic.
Best of luck to you!
Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policies [icann.org]