Forum Moderators: phranque

Message Too Old, No Replies

Number of Characters In Meta Tags

         

ladybird

2:37 pm on May 17, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Could anyone please confirm the maximum number of characters that webmasters should think about using for the title and description tags?

Thanks

moltar

2:55 pm on May 17, 2005 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



I'd estimate about zero :).

IMHO keywords and description meta tags are not important these days. Search engines either do not look at them at all or if they do, they give it very little to no value.

I'd rather have my page lighter by that many bytes and have my real content closer to the top of the file then use meta tags.

ken_b

3:12 pm on May 17, 2005 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



In the <title> I think the number for Google is something like 63 . At least somewhere around there is how many show on the serps.

As far as the <description> goes, I just checked my serps on Google for a bunch of pages and quite a number of them were showing my page description. That seems to come and go, but it's probably better to have a BRIEF description available in for the SEs to use if they choose to.

Brief Description is the key here from my point of view.

If you are worried about how many characters you can squeeze in there, you'd probably be better off building more pages. That way it's easier to write a brief deescription that very accurately targets the page contents.

By brief I mean 5 - 15 words. If you need more than that, you probably need more pages, at least in my mind.

Reid

2:24 am on May 18, 2005 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Google has been using my META descriptions for the past month.

Title is CRITICAL!

Title - about 64 characters
desc - about 155 characters max for google.
keywords- just about depecrated due to spam.

Reid

2:32 am on May 18, 2005 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



description meta tags are not important these days. Search engines either do not look at them at all or if they do, they give it very little to no value.

If google is using the description tag in the SERP's then they are certainly looking at it.

I'd rather have my page lighter by that many bytes and have my real content closer to the top of the file then use meta tags.

real content in the <head> is as close at it gets to the top of file. (besides inurl)
title and description.

leadegroot

9:19 am on May 18, 2005 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Google doesn't actually use the meta description to determine rankings, but, in cases where it is displayed in the SERPs, it is seen by Real People - so it better read well and seductively :)

SEOMike

2:51 pm on May 18, 2005 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



I go with:
Title: 50
Descript.: 150
Keywords: 1000

You can confirm the 50/150 through reading the SERPS. The only reason I use these tags is to attract a visitor from the SERPS. I keep the keywords to 1000, well, just because.

A description that says something like:
Your number 1 source for widgets online. Widgets galore in all types of colors and sizes

looks much better than:
¦home¦contact¦about¦... for a type of widget you should... go somewhere else...

If you don't specify a description tag, go over the character limit, or have an error in your code, the SEs will go pick their own description... and then it's no longer up to you what they display.

Reid

3:34 am on May 19, 2005 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Google doesn't actually use the meta description to determine rankings

You never know..
when I do a search and find my META description with search terms highlighted ... you just never know.

larryhatch

10:28 am on May 19, 2005 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



I read here endlessly, how meta-description is useless, deprecated, ignored .. waste of space
and time. Then later, comes a complaint that the snippets for a site came from some outdated
directory. Reason given? He didn't have a meta description. Why not? because M.D's are useless,
deprecated, ignored and a waste of time. - Larry

Reid

6:21 pm on May 19, 2005 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



We also have to remember that there are a lot of other search engines and directories that do use it. Maybe google gives a brownie point for having one.