Welcome to WebmasterWorld Guest from

Forum Moderators: phranque

Message Too Old, No Replies

Min. RAM for Windows XP

12:29 pm on Jul 29, 2003 (gmt 0)

Junior Member

10+ Year Member

joined:Aug 7, 2002
votes: 0

I am having a "heated" debate with management over the amount or RAM needed to run XP and office xp (2002) along with several other programs. They are very cheap here and think 132 is good. I said I need at least 256 but ideally 512.

Any toughts?

12:43 pm on July 29, 2003 (gmt 0)

Senior Member

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member

joined:Dec 27, 2002
votes: 0

It will run with 256 but is counterproductive.

512 for any XP machine. Ram is cheaper than time.....

12:50 pm on July 29, 2003 (gmt 0)

Junior Member

10+ Year Member

joined:Mar 12, 2003
votes: 0

I've had a machine running here with XP and 256MB

You could notice the lag, which was annoying. Anything less would be painful.

Time is definatly money and considering RAM is so cheap, you be best to go the whole hog and get 512. Theres nothing worse than waiting for a computer to catch up all the time - it annoys the hell out of me, very frustrating for users!

12:57 pm on July 29, 2003 (gmt 0)

Preferred Member

10+ Year Member

joined:Mar 14, 2001
votes: 0

The machine Iím on right now only has 256 on XP and does fine BUT I have every XP gadget shut off from the beginning.
No pop up bubbles, old 98 style menus and functions.

My laptop has 512 and all the bells and whistles running and is a bit faster. The next time it will be a gig of Ram from the start.

256 is the bare minimum for XP, on the other hand if you get paid by the hour 128 might be better and lend to more work hours.

12:58 pm on July 29, 2003 (gmt 0)

Senior Member

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member

joined:Feb 27, 2002
votes: 0

How many machines?
1:06 pm on July 29, 2003 (gmt 0)

Preferred Member

10+ Year Member

joined:Mar 1, 2003
votes: 0

jbinbpt summed it up nicely.... RAM is cheaper than time.

512MB now seems to be the standard for many of the clients that I deal with. Now, if we could just get the users to learn how to use the computer...


11:18 pm on Aug 27, 2003 (gmt 0)

New User

10+ Year Member

joined:Aug 27, 2003
votes: 0

just joined the site, and thought that someone at some point might want the exacts on a few of the os's:

without office, the absolute minimum ratings for some of the windows versions are as follows. not sure if office adds some kind of necessary amount, though as mentioned here, bare minimums are not considered 'comfortable'.

hard drive space is also bare minimum - in some cases i have some data as to the full range of possibilities.

Win XP Pro: 233mhz, 64mb RAM, 2gb hard drive space

(the above applies to the corporate version, not clear if other versions of XP pro have a different ram requirement)

Win Me: 150mhz processor, 32mb Ram, 320-420mb hard drive space

- earlier versions (below) don't complain about mhz -

Win 2k server/adv. server: 256mb RAM, 1-2gb hard drive space

Win 2k pro: 64mb RAM, 650mb-2gb hard drive space

Win 98se: 16-24mb RAM, 195mb hard drive space

hope this helps

11:23 pm on Aug 27, 2003 (gmt 0)

Moderator from GB 

WebmasterWorld Administrator mack is a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month

joined:June 15, 2001
votes: 15

Well for a while I was running XP pro on a machine with a 2 gig HD and only 128 meg of ram. Couple that with a not so fast processor and you have a snail in tortoises cloathing.

Not at all recomemded. 256 would seam to be the min standard for reasonable speed.


10:45 am on Aug 28, 2003 (gmt 0)

New User

10+ Year Member

joined:July 23, 2003
votes: 0

I've seen XP Pro running at an acceptable speed on a 400Mhz laptop with 160Mb RAM.