Forum Moderators: phranque
I decided to take an inventory of database file extensions to see which was most popular by seeing how many Google listed. Here is what I found:
ASP - 20,400,000
PHP - 13,900,000
CFM - 5,100,000
lasso - 72,500
BD - 60,400
MDB - 33,000
This really says a lot about who the leaders are. PHP is really grabbing some market. I wonder how close it was to ASP a year ago. I'll bet it has gained quite a bit. What did I miss?
Onya
Woz
But speaking of File Maker pro - is that considered a real database these days? Is it truly relational? Does it compare with Access at all? Can you make an ODBC or direct connection to it?
I've heard a lot about FMP but I don't remember it being anything but a toy.
>Is it truly relational?
Yes, if you program it that way.
>Does it compare with Access at all?
Yes, it is different. For one, the tables are kept in seperate files. Access generally keeps things in one file unless you specifically link to another data source. Both have their advantages.
>Can you make an ODBC or direct connection to it?
Yes. If memory serves, FMPro 4 has ODBC to retrieve but not write data. FMP5 has both. However FMP5 is a total re-write of the program itself in C therefor requiring a total re-write of your database. You cannot upgrade from 4 to 5, which is why I haven't.
>I've heard a lot about FMP but I don't remember it being anything but a toy.
It has its uses, and in some repects is easier to use than Access. However, like you, I prefer ASP to other protocols so I mainly stick to Access.
My collegue on the other hand swears by it. Horses and Courses.
Onya
Woz