Forum Moderators: buckworks & webwork

Message Too Old, No Replies

speculation over the next round of gTLDs

         

bill

6:48 am on Feb 8, 2017 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



Some are already trying to figure out when ICANN will start accepting submissions for the inevitable next round of keyword gTLDs.

http://www.circleid.com/posts/20170207_next_gtld_round_a_seven_year_itch/ [circleid.com]

Next gTLD Round - A Seven Year Itch?

On 12 January 2012, ICANN opened the first application window for new gTLDs, which ultimately resulted in 1,930 applications. It was almost another two years before we saw the first TLDs delegated, but once we got over the initial teething problems a regular flow of delegations followed. In the latter half of 2016, we started to see some real inroads being made by the next generation of TLDs, and predictions for 2017 are extremely positive. There is no doubt that there is already demand for the next application window for new gTLDs to open, and as the only organization that can respond to that demand, ICANN has a responsibility to provide some predictability as to when that will happen.
Deadlines drive action, so what we all need is a date. If there is indeed going to be a next round, then lets draw a line in the sand so we can all work toward that deadline.


I have heard rumors of as early as 2018. The author of this article guesses 2019. Some ICANN reps apparently suggest 2020. When will the next round start?

jmccormac

10:14 am on Feb 8, 2017 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



There's still a lot of issues to be resolved before the second round can be launched. It could be 2018 or 2020. And there are still some of the first round new gTLDs that are struggling and may not make it that far without being taken over.

Regards...jmcc

Dimitri

10:40 am on Feb 8, 2017 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 5+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



Beside .com/.net/.org and the country level extension, i never had the opportunity to see a site using anything else, or even saw it in the Google's search results.

accurate

9:20 pm on Feb 21, 2017 (gmt 0)

5+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



Not looking good for new Gs.

[hosterstats.com...]

lucy24

11:33 pm on Feb 21, 2017 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



Beside .com/.net/.org and the country level extension, i never had the opportunity to see a site using anything else, or even saw it in the Google's search results.

There is also a tiny smattering of worthwhile .info sites.* But that's one tld as against the, what, dozens that now exist? Seems like that should be enough for all normal purposes.


* Where "tiny smattering" means that the ones I actually use can be counted on my thumbs, unless I overlooked one.

Dimitri

12:08 am on Feb 22, 2017 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 5+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



Your're right lucy24, I forget the ".info", I had a few domain names with it, because it was sounding "good", (and still sounds good), I forget about it, because it has been introduced so long ago, ... in year 2000 or 2001, if I don't make mistake.

>> dozens that now exist? <<

if I don't make mistake there is 700 gTLD :-D (and 2.000 pending)? May be someone will come with more accurate info...

jmccormac

12:23 am on Feb 22, 2017 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



Bit more than 700.
[iana.org...]

Some of the brand gTLDs have not even come up with a plan on using their new gTLD. Other new gTLDs have failed to meet expectations. And there are some that are doing OK. The problem is that apart from a handful of new gTLDs, they are niche rather than generic TLDs. The extension acts as a limiter.

Some of the usage for a few new gTLDs is extremely low due to the freebie and low cost promotions. These promotions don't provide any impetus for the registrant to develop websites or services and many of these promotions are exploited by spammers. For these gTLDs relying on discounting to drive registrations volume, the zone file count of domain names is not a good metric.

Regards...jmcc

accurate

5:24 pm on Feb 22, 2017 (gmt 0)

5+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



I wonder which TLDs will go bankrupt this year?

Dimitri

5:46 pm on Feb 22, 2017 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 5+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



I wonder how many domain names have been registered for each of these gTLDs, and among them how many are really being exploited ?

jmccormac

6:02 pm on Feb 22, 2017 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



The domain counts are on various sites. The web usage/development percentage for some of them is below 20% but there are a few that are doing well. High quality TLDs tend to have web usage rates around 30%. There's also a problem with content in that some of the freebie and discounted registrations are not actively developed and some may be used for spam and other nefarious purposes. As a result holding pages/and PPC might actually appear to swamp the numbers of developed websites in a TLD.

The number of domain names in a zonefile is does not directly reflect the usage of that TLD. Measuring usage is a very complex process.

Regards...jmcc

accurate

12:14 am on Feb 23, 2017 (gmt 0)

5+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



Measuring usage of new domains is easy though. There is none! :)