Forum Moderators: buckworks & webwork

Message Too Old, No Replies

Should I buy a domain that's indexed but not cached?

Should I buy a domain that's indexed but not cached?

         

chuckles

6:02 am on Oct 5, 2009 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



I'm about to buy a domain from a private seller but noticed that the domain is in the Google index but isn't cached. Is this something to worry about?

As an example of what I mean, try to Google: site:example.com [google.com] (not the domain I'm buying but shows what I'm talking about). Notice that it's in the Google index but it shows no description text and no Cached link.

Is this simply because Google doesn't value the page since it's almost identical to other domains parked with the same service? Or could it indicate something wrong with the domain such that I shouldn't buy it.

Thanks for any advice!

[edited by: buckworks at 6:08 am (utc) on Oct. 5, 2009]
[edit reason] Please no specifics; see TOS [/edit]

buckworks

6:22 am on Oct 5, 2009 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Administrator 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



Some website owners / managers prefer not to permit caching by outside parties. If that's the case it's nothing to worry about. Check the source code to see whether caching has been forbidden.

Look for a meta tag like this:

<meta name="robots" content="noarchive">

almost identical to other domains parked with the same service

Once the domain has its own unique content, the search engines will eventually catch on and begin to treat it normally.

You'll be starting from scratch, so good luck!

chuckles

6:32 am on Oct 5, 2009 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



No there isn't a nocache or noarchive directive. The page does have a description meta tag but Google still doesn't show it. There is a disallow all in the robots.txt so the Way Back Machine doesn't show any archives of the domain unfortunately.

I'm just trying to ensure I don't buy a domain with a penalty or anything like that, and hope Google does treat the site normally once we put our content there. Thanks for the reply.

onepointone

6:37 am on Oct 5, 2009 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



The lack of a cache doesn't mean there is a problem. But it doesn't mean there isn't a problem either. It just means you have less information to go off of. IMO

I like to look at the Way Back Machine for domains that have been 'around the block' a few times so to speak...

chuckles

5:26 am on Oct 6, 2009 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Thanks for the replies. Makes me feel better about the purchase.