Forum Moderators: buckworks & webwork

Message Too Old, No Replies

Introduction of new gTLD's delayed

.whatever

         

RonPK

12:53 pm on Feb 19, 2009 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



AP reports [google.com]:
ICANN had wanted to start taking applications for new names early this year, but the timetable proved too ambitious given the extent of the feedback. ICANN now expects to open bids around December.

From the ICANN site:

There have been a number of overarching issues raised in the comment process that require further work and so remain unchanged in this draft. Those issues are:
* Trademark protection
* Security and stability
* Malicious conduct
* Demand and economic analysis

Not very surprising, IMHO.

kaled

6:02 pm on Feb 19, 2009 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Why don't they simply open up domain names without any suffix at all - that would put the problem to bed permanently. Existing owners of .com and .net equivalents, etc. could be offered first refusal.

Of course, whilst this would mean less confusion, it would also mean less money!

Kaled.

StoutFiles

6:07 pm on Feb 19, 2009 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Why don't they simply open up domain names without any suffix at all - that would put the problem to bed permanently.

There would be an uproar if they did that.

webdoctor

4:41 pm on Feb 20, 2009 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



There would be an uproar if they did that.

from whom? (seriously!)

StoutFiles

5:17 am on Feb 21, 2009 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



^People that own the .net and .org of a popular word.

kaled

1:03 pm on Feb 21, 2009 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Every time a new domain suffix is introduced, owners of existing domain names have to take a decision as to whether or not to "waste money" on buying new domain names merely to set up redirects to the primary domain name.

By introducing suffix-free domain names (and adopting a policy of no new suffixes) this problem would be solved once and for all - I don't know about causing uproar, most webmasters would be delighted (but not registrars, etc. that profit from the existing barking-mad system).

Kaled.

piatkow

5:05 pm on Feb 21, 2009 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



Maybe its time to scrap the entire system and start again.