I've scanned a purported copy of the court's seizure order an it includes domains such as GoldenPalace.com, AbsolutePoker.com. SportsBook.com, SportsBetting.com and FulltiltPoker.com.
I have a hunch that a great deal of procedural and substantive law research did not precede the filing of this legal action.
It is also one of the great arguments for ICANN to be under United Nations jurisdiction.
I happen to live in a country where internet gambling is legal (not that I am involved in the business) - so I would like someone to explain how the Commonwealth of Kentucky, or the United States for that matter, thinks it has jurisdiction over people who are not its citizens. (absolutepoker.com appears to be registered in Portugal, sportsbetting.com in the Netherlands and fulltiltpoker.com in the UK)
Or is Kentucky just being so open that they would be happy to let the Saudi Arabian government seize jackdaniels.com as alcohol is illegal under their jurisdiction.
What I find funny is how they keep calling the services/sites illegal sites.... however that isn't true and it is appalling how often they repeat it.
Or is Kentucky just being so open that they would be happy to let the Saudi Arabian government seize jackdaniels.com as alcohol is illegal under their jurisdiction
The is the best example of how silly this is.... Imagine the outrage if Saudi had an article about the illegal drinking websites promoting alcohol to children and society.
I would like someone to explain how the Commonwealth of Kentucky, or the United States for that matter, thinks it has jurisdiction over people who are not its citizens.