Forum Moderators: buckworks & webwork

Message Too Old, No Replies

Domain Name forwarding

301 vs 302 redirect and SE issues

         

androidtech

2:31 pm on May 25, 2007 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



I just got a new domain name related to a product I cover on one of my web sites. At some point I intend to develop the domain name as a user community site, whereas the current site section on the old domain is more product detail oriented.

In the meantime, I am considering forwarding the new domain name via the registrars forwarding service which uses a 301 or 302 redirect, to related site section on the old domain. Note: There most likely will *not* be any links to the domain from other sites and any traffic will come in from URL "type-in" traffic.

Here are my questions/concerns:

- If I use a 301 or 302 redirect, will I run into any search engine penalties when I do split off and develop the new domain? Will I have trouble getting the new domain pages ranked due to the previous forwarding?

- Will the existing content on the old domain, the redirection destination, be penalized from a duplicate content standpoint if a search engine does happen to crawl the site starting from the new forwarded domain name?

- Which redirect code would be better to use in this case, 301 or 302?

Any other tips or warnings would be appreciated.

Thanks.

pageoneresults

4:09 pm on May 31, 2007 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



I'd suggest keeping the domain dormant until you are ready to launch.

In your scenario, a 302 would be suggested. The problem is, there have been many reported issues with the SE's and 302s so I wouldn't risk whatever may occur.

You wouldn't do a 301 in this instance. Since you plan on launching under that new domain at a later date, you don't want to tell the bots that the resource has 301 Moved Permanently. You would want to return a 302 Found which means...

The requested resource resides temporarily under a different URI. Since the redirection might be altered on occasion, the client SHOULD continue to use the Request-URI for future requests. This response is only cacheable if indicated by a Cache-Control or Expires header field.

But again, I'd keep that domain dormant and unseen until you are ready to launch. But, that's just me, I like to take the conservative approach. ;)