I plan on making many, many subdomains for my websites.
I have 20 sites now, all root domains.
How many subdomains can I have by URL, 10? 100? 1000? No limit?
Do search engines give more priority to names like:
www.{example}dot com
versus:
www.{widgets.example}dot com?
Does a www.{example}dot com site with a PR6 will leak page rank to a www.{widgets.example}dot com site with a PR0?
Do domains get indexed and crawled faster than subdomains?
All that matters is the value to your visitors, and justifying the extra resources you'll need to populate, market and SEO that new (sub)domain.
If there's a point to it, go for it. But also consider the other options
1. Using folders (eg www.domain.com/folder/, www.domain.com/folder2/) which will allow the sites ranking to be concentrated rather than shared between multiple domains.
2. Creating a whole new domain for a whole new topic (eg www.domain.com, www.domain2.com), which may reduce the risk of visitor confusion and complex navigation.
It all depends on why you think you need multiple (sub)domains.
So that the search engines see it as one site, not two (like sharing resources).
www.exmaple.com/widget?
Inside the widget folder will be a whole new site with it's own index file and structure.
Should I put a link to it from www.exmaple.com? Should I create a new link campaign for www.exmaple.com/widget?
What would be a fast and sure way to get www.exmaple.com/widget indexed?
But yes, in the widget folder you can have an entire site (one of my sites is like this, with folders of sites inside the other folders). :)
A. A fresh Subdomain with a link to every single page on the site from the index file.
B. An established site housing a folder with the new site inside it with a link to every single page on the site from the index file.
in other words,
What is more crawler friendly and will get indexed quicker?
www.widgets.example.com new URL with no page rank but at the root level
or
www.example.com/widgets based on established URL with page rank but far away from the root
But it does depend to some extent how old the 'existing site' is, and what else is on the site. Related content, some say, will rank quicker - and better.
To be comparable with a subdomain, don't plant the new content to deep. But there is no reason why site.com/newstuff shouldn't do as well as newstuff.site.com - and better, if there's existing content, existing incomng links and existing ranking at site.com.
But you will need to build in good navigation so the new stuff really is part of the existing site, in order to gain the 'shared domain' benefits.
Ok, so how about this, if I use this way:
www.example.com/site
On the example.com/index.php should I put a link to this?
http://www.example.com/site
or a link to this?
http://www.example.com/site.index.html
Cheers!
[edited by: Webwork at 7:32 am (utc) on Mar. 11, 2007]
[edit reason] Charter [webmasterworld.com] [/edit]