Forum Moderators: not2easy
This 'container table, with nesting' could result in the old 'blank page until massive load' situation, keeping the new visitor wondering "where's the page?".
Why isn't this true for browser rendering of pages where everything is contained within a single 'container div', one that contains multiple nested divs?
Why won't a browser withhold displaying the page while it sorts out positioning within the container div?
Won't the delay be the same as if it was all contained within a container table?
If not, why not? What's your authority (besides intelligence and experience far superior to mine?)
However, because very few people realize this (and browser support has been spotty) most web designers are under the impression that tables have to wait for all content to render... starting with the innermost table. But, that is not necessarily the case. It entirely depends on whether the number of columns etc has been defined or not.
The technical reason why divs are not plagued by this is that a div itself is a single element, always. A table, however, does not exist without rows and cells. Thus, before the table knows how big it is supposed to be it has to wait for all <tr> and <td> elements to load (up until the closing </table>) before size can be determined. In the case of a table used as a wrapper for the whole page, the entire page therefore has to load before reaching </table> for the first table. Specifying the number of columns (as described on the above pages) avoids this problem.