Forum Moderators: not2easy
I have a PR5 site created two years ago, updated several times a week, and while that sounds hunky-dory, I didn't realize at the time that my designer had loaded about a million different sized white "images" as part of the design. So load time for the site has always been an issue for dialup people because each of those white images (invisible to the eye because they just fill in the background on the page) have to load individually. It's fine on Broadband, though.
So over the last two years I've done my best to become a smart web person, learned CSS, Photoshop, SEO, all that good stuff and now have my redesign for the site all ready....a nice clean CSS design, very optimized yet still keeping the personality and content of the old version of the my site. I intend to keep all the original file names and leave the internal navigation of the site the same, just load a new CSS stylesheet and use a different layout on the pages.
The stupid question is...will that screw me up? I had thought that keeping the same file names for all the pages, plus the same navigation, should keep the spiders happy when they view the new page, but I'm still a little superstitious about suddenly losing page rank and all that organic traffic overnight because the site is being served through a completely new design template and things are laid out a bit differently.
What do the veterans think? When I upload the new site, which is more likely to happen:
a) All will be exactly the same with traffic, PR, etc.;
b) There could be a momentary dip of a few months until the spiders get used to the redesign;
c) I disappear from the search engines and end up starting over again, reborn as Ms. Crankypants.
I have over 2000 backlinks, so that's a good thing.
Thanks in advance for feedback!
Cosmokid
Do double check the navigation with xenu. And if other changes are planned, give the SEs chance to spider the site a couple of times first.
CSS takes out a lot of clutter, so understanding your site is easier for the spider.
Order of things and appropriate use of tags such as <h1> <h2> etc will make it easier to spot structure, and you can play with that order as well.
As long as you keep the old URLs you are good as far as my experience goes.
Anybody giving you dozens of differently sized blank images is a fool. You could stretch that transparent 1x1 pixel image to any size you needed long before CSS got in use.
Second stupid question...what's xenu, other than Tom Cruise's best friend? Is this a CSS code validation tool or something?It's a handy tool for checking navigation and more. Xenu is your friend.
And if you don't know xenu, Google is your friend. ;)
There is an indirect Tom Cruise connection, but that's for a foo thread. :)
bye.......
[edited by: SuzyUK at 10:45 am (utc) on Nov. 3, 2006]
[edit reason] Please no URLs : see TOS #13 [WebmasterWorld.com] [/edit]
But, given a strong IBL portfolio and all the improvements you're making, you'll be better off in the long run. Some people are afraid to touch a page that's doing well for fear it will stop working. Don't fall into that trap, because it can almost always perform better. Testing for better traffic and conversions should be an ongoing process.