Forum Moderators: not2easy
Well, it's usually something like 1x500 but yeah. Use PNGs btw, they seem to encode gradients really efficiently.
Unfortunately, if you need to pair that PNG with a normal hex colour (say, you have your gradient light at top, gradually getting darker until the end of the image where you have that flat hex colour,) naturally, IE doesn't render PNGs properly - your PNG could end at #222 and your background colour could be #222, but they don't look like the same colour in IE (6 - I've seen, that's enough for me.)
And, for that very reason, I would use a jpg :)
500 wouldn't cover a page or even the top fold
Depends on what you're designing for? at 800*600, maximised screen you have how much viewport? 770*440?
And, as I have stated above - to make your gradients end nicely, you add a background colour in sync with your image, and it will look good.
[edit]
... and sonjay beat me to the punch :)
[/edit]
[edited by: Setek at 4:13 am (utc) on Sep. 26, 2006]
[edited by: Robin_reala at 6:48 am (utc) on Sep. 26, 2006]
Setek - I've noticed gradient gamma problems in Safari on versions of MacOS X less than 10.4, but I've really never had any problems in IE (and I do this a lot). IE completely ignores the gamma chunks of PNGs so I'd be very surprised if it was a problem.
This cannot be conveyed any other way but by image.
<snip>
There's a distinct difference there :)
[edited by: DrDoc at 7:44 am (utc) on Sep. 26, 2006]
[edit reason] Still, no URLs, please. [/edit]
Also if you are fading to "black" check the RGB/HEX values in the paint program to make sure they are (R=0,G=0,B=0). I've seen pallettes where what your eye thinks is black is actually something like R=0,G=0,B=51 (almost black, but really a very dark blue)..