Forum Moderators: not2easy
Looking at the code, I'm not sure where to start, it's like a needle in a haystack trying to look at all the positioning numbers to find the issues.
Any advice?
Thanks
Shelley
I recently had to "debug" a site that had been written with this, I've never used it myself but it certainly seems to have a unique way of building pages.. but perhaps it's the way the author uses it?
I get the impression that you can literally build the whole page like a DTP programme and move the "layers" around, but as for trying to correct it from the source code, I found it easier to rebuild the whole page from scratch.
It's hard to explain, but in the page I was working on a "list" of links had each link in a seperate "layer" that had been absolutely positioned so it fitted in with the background, but in the source code these links weren't even adjacent to each other and because of DW's "layer" numbering convention it was virtually impossible to reposition.
which is what I think you mean by:
Looking at the code, I'm not sure where to start, it's like a needle in a haystack trying to look at all the positioning numbers to find the issues.
Hello, I did a search on layers but did not see anything regarding layer validation.
That's because the term layers is not strictly correct, they are actually <div>'s and a validator won't stop you from overlapping <divs> as it is perfectly legal (from a validator point of view)to do so..
Suzy
I think that clients who own DreamWeaver (DW - sorry, not DM!)are going to be increasingly frustrated because the WYSIWYG layer "drawing" feature simply lets you draw square shapes all over the page to make positioning super-easy.
<sigh>
Guess, I'll recreate his pages using tables and templates so the format is locked down.
Thanks again!