Forum Moderators: not2easy
My first question to all is: Do they actually help in creating unique articles which Google Bots cannot distinguish between?
Second: If Google is aware of such tools, why cannot its algorithm learn their tricks and track duplication ?
Third: What if Google comes to know of your article spinning submissions?
Would be happy to receive your feedback/suggestions on this :)
>> My first question to all is: Do they actually help in creating unique articles which Google Bots cannot distinguish between?
See above. The majority is useless.
>> Second: If Google is aware of such tools, why cannot its algorithm learn their tricks and track duplication ?
A good spinner that uses different words, but has same meaning, for bulk of the paragraph, is not duplicate.
>> Third: What if Google comes to know of your article spinning submissions?
Oh, that's a question nearly impossible to answer :)
>> A competitor used a mixmaster on my site content. I denounced him to Google and his site was removed from the results.
If you use a mixer that puts sentence A after sentence C but keeps all info on page, it can be defined as spinning.
Now, if you take the same content but change the words in them, it cannot be defined as duplicate. It's in fact a fresh new article.
I write of my content but am interested in understanding how these tools work so that we can implement it in a manual process and make it more efficient.
A threasures would suggest multiple words as alternatives.
For each and every sentence, the core words shall be rotated.
and also be copy-scape/Google verified.