Where to get the best plr articles?

Can anybody tell me where to get the best plr articles

[coniac]

Hi,

I had a horrible time creating websites around low paying keywords as i had no idea what i was actually doing being a newbie.

Now i am planning to create a site around high paying keywords using PLR articles but am confused as there are so many sites offering this kind of service. Moreover some sites are quite costly to meet my monthly expenses being a student and with no job.

So i want to request you guys to give your honest suggestions in this regard and let me know the site where to get an affordable PRL aticles.

Thanks

[online_mike]

Im wondering about this as well,

Nobody has any opinions on this?

All the best /Mike

[purplecape]

What's a PLR article and why are PLR articles useful for building a site?

I have to say that the idea of creating "a site around high paying keywords" rather than around content seems like putting the cart before the horse, but to each his or her own, right?

[jtara]

PLR = "Private Label Rights". i.e. you don't have to reference the source - you are allowed to pass them off as your own.

The best place is to hire a competent writer.

Better yet, develop a site and unique content around a concept or need, not around keywords.

IMO, by assuming that "high paying keywords" are more profitable than "low paying keywords", you are making your second mistake.

[purplecape]

Thanks, jtara. Basically the same as what's called "work for hire" in book publishing, in which copyright is transferred to the person/company paying for the work.

[jtara]

Basically the same as what's called "work for hire" in book publishing

Not really. It's not a work for hire, because they sell the same article to many people with the same rights.

IMO, these articles are basically worthless. A pretty good deal for the writer, to sell them to anybody, and over and over again to boot.

Better to hire a real writer, and get a true work for hire. You aren't likely to do that on these word-mill websites.

[purplecape]

Thanks for clarifying. I had assumed that the article would only be used on one site.

I agree--I can't see such an article being very useful.