Forum Moderators: phranque
I checked my error logs and whenever I type
"apachectl restart" (or "service httpd restart" which is the same)
the following error messages get included in my error logs:
[Tue Feb 17 18:16:18 2004] [warn] child process 31232 still did not exit, sending a SIGTERM
[Tue Feb 17 18:16:18 2004] [warn] child process 30996 still did not exit, sending a SIGTERM
[Tue Feb 17 18:16:18 2004] [warn] child process 31055 still did not exit, sending a SIGTERM
[Tue Feb 17 18:16:18 2004] [warn] child process 31232 still did not exit, sending a SIGTERM
[Tue Feb 17 18:16:18 2004] [warn] child process 30996 still did not exit, sending a SIGTERM
[Tue Feb 17 18:16:18 2004] [warn] child process 31055 still did not exit, sending a SIGTERM
[Tue Feb 17 18:16:19 2004] [warn] child process 31232 still did not exit, sending a SIGTERM
[Tue Feb 17 18:16:19 2004] [warn] child process 30996 still did not exit, sending a SIGTERM
[Tue Feb 17 18:16:19 2004] [warn] child process 31055 still did not exit, sending a SIGTERM
[Tue Feb 17 18:16:24 2004] [error] child process 31232 still did not exit, sending a SIGKILL
[Tue Feb 17 18:16:24 2004] [error] child process 30996 still did not exit, sending a SIGKILL
[Tue Feb 17 18:16:24 2004] [error] child process 31055 still did not exit, sending a SIGKILL
Apart form that, when I type:
"apachectl status" I receive the following error:
Looking up localhost
localhost
Making HTTP connection to localhost
Alert!: Unable to connect to remote host.
lynx: Can't access startfile [localhost...]
The strange thing about this, is that when I go to mysite.com/server-stats I see the following:
Current Time: Tuesday, 17-Feb-2004 18:22:43 CST
Restart Time: Tuesday, 17-Feb-2004 18:16:41 CST
Parent Server Generation: 2
Server uptime: 6 minutes 2 seconds
Total accesses: 3573 - Total Traffic: 37.0 MB
CPU Usage: u6.38 s1.47 cu.07 cs.02 - 2.19% CPU load
9.87 requests/sec - 104.8 kB/second - 10.6 kB/request
36 requests currently being processed, 14 idle workers
Has anybody compiled apache 2.0.48 with worker MPM?
I will really appreciate if anybody can help me here, I hear worker MPM is not so stable but it's DEFINITIVELY much better than prefork.
My site is currently using around 50-80 (worker) when it used to use around 150-300 (prefork)
Regards
Xavier
Thanks,
Jim
I installed Apache 2.0.48 and now my system uses around 70 processes, it used to use around 150+ processes with Apache 2.0.40.
The only "bug" I received was this, however the rest of it really works.
If anybody has other experiences with "worker MPM", please let me know. I can also help anybody that might need some help ;)
Regards
