Forum Moderators: bakedjake
How is that possible, with a 2.5 billion index, versus Gigablast's index of 150 million? Don't know, but my guess is that it has to do with Google's recently admitted hand filtering of results.
Since Gigablast seems more 'machine' at least for the moment, I'm liking the results better...as a person anyway, as a marketer, Google treats me better :)