Just looked at the SERPS for the first time in long time
Western
1:50 am on Jan 23, 2009 (gmt 0)
And it reminds me of Altavista back in '99.
Has this been the case for awhile?
(Not sure if this is the correct category for the post).
Quadrille
12:27 pm on Jan 23, 2009 (gmt 0)
It looks pretty uncuil (it always did), but it doesn't look dead to me.
Reno
9:03 pm on Jan 23, 2009 (gmt 0)
Over the past few days they've been crawling some of my sites at a greater frequency, so there's still a pulse.
.....................
bill
5:10 am on Jan 30, 2009 (gmt 0)
They still haven't fixed that ridiculous mis-matched image problem. They show my sites with images that have nothing to do with them and my images are on other listings.
StoutFiles
5:48 am on Jan 30, 2009 (gmt 0)
Cuil had one big chance and they blew it. It would take a miracle for them to get another shot.
particleman
11:52 pm on Mar 6, 2009 (gmt 0)
For them to bomb something so basic as displaying at least an image from the site that was searched is pretty bad. I think they would've had a great chance of success had they worked out a few basic issues.
bill
1:51 am on Mar 7, 2009 (gmt 0)
I took another look at their SERPs. Same image mismatch problem. ZZZZZzzzzz
BillyS
2:19 am on Mar 7, 2009 (gmt 0)
Based on their traffic, I would say this one is well done. Very unfortunate.
