At least my sites are updated for the first time in almost a year, many more sites are in, and index looks good.
Anyone else noticed that Wisenut updated their index?
rfgdxm1
1:06 am on Dec 15, 2003 (gmt 0)
I notice on page on my site where I changed the page title something like 5 months ago and it still shows the old title in Wisenut, so this isn't across the board. And besides, who actually uses Wisenut? I just checked, and my Wisenut SERPs are *great*. As in #1 or #2 for the most target search terms. I can't remember the last time I saw a Wisenut hit in my site logs. :(
sem4u
8:24 am on Dec 15, 2003 (gmt 0)
Some page titles seem to be updated and the index looks quite good. The only problem is lack of any referrals...
jeremy goodrich
8:08 pm on Dec 15, 2003 (gmt 0)
LookSmart seems to have bigger issues at hand -> than pushing resources to a project that never really got off the ground.
nick420
10:57 pm on Dec 15, 2003 (gmt 0)
Wasn't Wisenut supposed to start using the data collected from the Grub client at some point? For those that don't know, the Grub client is essentially a distributed network of cawlers.
martinibuster
11:37 pm on Dec 15, 2003 (gmt 0)
Yup, wisenut finally updated. That was a long time coming.
martinibuster
3:53 pm on Dec 16, 2003 (gmt 0)
Interesting- I found a wisenut referral in my logs.
penfold25
4:01 pm on Dec 16, 2003 (gmt 0)
well they have been pretty useless so far , ive been spidered many times and hardly ever even appeared in the results.
I think its too late for them, maybe they should change their name or something
rfgdxm1
5:05 am on Dec 18, 2003 (gmt 0)
>LookSmart seems to have bigger issues at hand -> than pushing resources to a project that never really got off the ground.
THAT is an excellent point. The future of Wisenut looks bleak.
div01
10:37 pm on Dec 18, 2003 (gmt 0)
I'm not holding my breath to see a Wisenut referral.