Forum Moderators: skibum
Thanks for any advice,
Lin
You won't know until you try. It sounds like this site is important to you, and you don't want to plaster it with ugly ads. Give AdSense a try and see how that works for you. From there, affiliate programs might also work, but you have such a niche that I don't think other ad networks would do well. But, you don't know until you try.
He has a page about what he carries in his camera kit - cameras, lenses, etc. I feel like he would actually be improving the user experience if he linked up those items to a photo site like B&H. Of course, it does no harm to make that link an affiliate link.
I'm also trying to get him to try AdSense on a small subset of pages and put the ads way down at the bottom. In other words, where they would be *least* likely to get noticed, but also least likely to interfere with the user experience.
Try those two really modest experiments and see what happens. Of course, these ads are practically hidden, so income would be low, but it would be a way to ease into it and you could see whether or not you're losing visitors. If not, you could try a bit more obvious placement for a few months and watch the stats again.
Given my friend's attitude and yours to the site, I think the danger of plastering ads all over the site is low, so use your own judgement. When ads get obtrusive, just back it down a notch.
I use a similar strategy - "terrible" ad placement in that I have very unobtrusive banners and AdSense way at the bottom of a subset of pages, and nothing aside from a banner on the 10 most popular pages. I really only want them there for the person who is just not finding what they want on my site and looking everywhere for something interesting to click on. But on 250,000 page views, it's around $500-1000 I think (I'd have to look - I honestly don't pay that much attention). It was 3x that when the ads were more obtrusive, but I didn't like it (meanwhile, I have a low-traffic site that is plastered with ads and on 1/10 the traffic, it earns about the same).
[edited by: encyclo at 11:40 pm (utc) on Feb. 12, 2008]