Welcome to WebmasterWorld Guest from 18.104.22.168
Forum Moderators: open
joined:Nov 20, 2000
I'm back... just browsing, but feel I should re-cap what many people are missing (because it is buried well back in the thread now).
There are two phenomena
a) Algo/filter changes. These are being played out on SJ, and of course: if you are testing a change you use older tried and tested data, which is what Google has done (with a dash of Fresh). Hence all the missing links, strangely dropping sites, etc.
b) The update, with the application of the latest data and links.
It was spelled out earlier that the results on SJ will change when newer data, and this months crawl data, is brought in. However, the SJ effect may replicate at other centers before that data upgrade is applied.
I think that's an accurate reflection of reality, and the message is therefore don't panic. For those who have suffered on SJ, it might get worse before it gets better, but wait until the new data is in there before you throw a wobbler.
Since this is such a short thread, I see no reason not to post another stupid question. :)
GG - Could you give a better definition of 'next iteration'?
I honestly have tried not to use 'questionable' tactics in the design of my site. I have less pages in the -sj index than I had in the April update and yet I had many, many, more pages crawled.
Why would Google bother crawling my site over a multiple day period if it was not destined for inclusion in the update?
I have waited many months for the results I had hoped to see in the coming index. I don't mind waiting another month if that is what's going to happen. I just like to see a little light at the end of the tunnel. I also am still not clear on if this is the 'new data' or if that may be applied this month after -sj is included?
Sign me - Dazed and Confused
joined:Feb 26, 2003
"If you don't like it, then you call the site above you, SPAM, even if it's a quality site. Every one does that."
Rubbish. I will happily give the search phrase I used here and point out the replicated sites (not that you need much help) and tell you the authoritive sites (which have now effectively gone). If Google can justify these, they can put Saddam back in office.
[edited by: crobb305 at 12:48 am (utc) on May 6, 2003]
I just submitted a spamreport starting with: For "GoogleGuy" on webmasterworld from "peterdaly".
It regards a site filled with keyword stuffed alt tags, that dissapeared after the last "dance." (Good thing) You mentioned something about a hidden text filter in response to a posting of mine. The site is now back in the listings, including on sj. How long it's been back, I don't know.
The filter was good based on my small interactions of it. I think it should go back on, or if it still is there, be tweaked at least enough to filter out my example.
Thanks for an time you put into this, and other reports like this. Most of us really appreciate it.
2) 4 new sites, 2 months old, PR7 on current google, placed on pages 4..6, on SJ all of them has PR0 and placed on first page 1, on positions 2-5 for very competitive keywords.
From my perspective, I like what I see. It also helps that I know what direction things are going though.
Thanks for this little bit GoogleGuy. I get what you are saying, and as you, like me, don't like people who violate the Google TOS, I'm gonna sit back and look forward to that new spam filter.
and thanks for coming here and dealing with all of us mr.greengoogle, I mean mr. googlespam, uh, I mean mr.googlespan ;-]
Near as I can tell Google has abandoned the concept of pagerank and replaced it with speedy html creation.
Forget Bret's one year plan. Now it can be done in a week:
Make a lot of disposable pages;
make a lot of link exchanges for no other purpose than to exchange links;
sign guestbooks everywhere.
<edit forgot domain name in URL, even bigger than before>
[edited by: steveb at 1:05 am (utc) on May 6, 2003]
for instance, an article that came out in 2002 -
is shown as ARTICLE TITLE April 8, 2003 in Google, and following the link the title tag has today's date and the dateline is now today's date.
this appears to be an attempt to manipulate google news and or freshbot.
I didn't file a spam report for this, but I am sure it is easy to check, but sticky me or what ever if you need a "real" URL.