Welcome to WebmasterWorld Guest from 54.196.243.192

Forum Moderators: incrediBILL & lawman

Message Too Old, No Replies

California lawmaker wants to blur Google Earth

yet another good idea/bad implemetation bill

     
9:16 pm on Mar 11, 2009 (gmt 0)

Moderator from US 

WebmasterWorld Administrator lifeinasia is a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month

joined:Dec 10, 2005
posts:5551
votes: 24


CNN story [cnn.com]
-- "An operator of a commercial Internet Web site or online service that makes a virtual globe browser available to members of the public shall not provide aerial or satellite photographs or imagery of a building or facility in this state that is identified on the Internet Web site by the operator as a school or place of worship, or a government or medical building or facility, unless those photographs or images have been blurred.

The way the bill is currently written, if you have a web site that uses Google Maps, and Google doesn't blur the image of a church 2,000 miles away from you, YOU could also be liable for $250,000/day!

To keep this non-political, I'll reserve my comments about CA lawmakers...

11:07 am on Mar 19, 2009 (gmt 0)

Moderator from AU 

WebmasterWorld Administrator anallawalla is a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member

joined:Mar 3, 2003
posts:3701
votes: 3


gpilling,

Aerial survey aircraft don't fly over no-fly zones but you could equally charter a chopper to fly over someone else's property and take pictures to your heart's content. If you found someone sunbathing topless, you're not likely to post the image online. Even if you did, it would not merit much attention, but the first discovery of a topless sunbaker on Google Earth made world news. There doesn't seem to be much difference, but Google Earth/Maps/Street View strike terror into some people because a lot of major roads and streets are visible.

This 31 message thread spans 2 pages: 31