Welcome to WebmasterWorld Guest from 54.144.80.75

Forum Moderators: brett tabke

Message Too Old, No Replies

Keep the nostolgic feel.

     
10:27 pm on May 26, 2010 (gmt 0)

Junior Member

10+ Year Member

joined:Mar 4, 2004
posts:59
votes: 0


As an on-off lurker for many years (wow.. I feel dirty now) I gotta say I love that WW layout has remained this way visually.

Aye it's old, "cheap", and the logo probably has seen less sunlight then the latest MMO-addict ... but it's what makes WW a serious source for knowledge. People are more focused on discussion then some graphically flashed-up website to appeal to the strangers.

There's a lot of ideas about features and functionality that are not my expertise to comment on, but if the core design is coming up, KISS method always wins.
10:46 pm on May 26, 2010 (gmt 0)

Preferred Member

10+ Year Member

joined:Sept 26, 2002
posts:435
votes: 0


I agree, revamp the logo maybe some of the buttons but other than that keep it simple, streamline and content rich. No ads please - anyone who can't afford to pay the small subscription fee doesn't deserve to benefit from the site content.

If anything the stickymail, etc. could use a makeover but not the forums.

And please no member pictures, it's a big turn off (imho).
11:54 pm on May 26, 2010 (gmt 0)

Junior Member

10+ Year Member

joined:June 6, 2003
posts:162
votes: 0


I prefer to keep it simple as well. Some forums nowadays are barely readable. A few, well-chosen ads would be fine with me, but not so many they flood the place.

The important part is the posts so focus should be on those and being able to easily find those. Speaking of which, perhaps the Search and stickymail could use some updating.
11:59 pm on May 26, 2010 (gmt 0)

Senior Member

joined:Aug 12, 2004
posts:1781
votes: 0


Someone needs to be keeping score here...

The votes for keeping it simple on one side.

The votes for pulling out all the bells and whistles on the other.

Mark me down on the simple side.
12:01 am on May 27, 2010 (gmt 0)

Full Member

10+ Year Member

joined:June 10, 2005
posts:271
votes: 0


What about the vote for updating it into this millenia but still keeping it simple? Why does it have to be one extreme or the other?
12:09 am on May 27, 2010 (gmt 0)

Senior Member

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 5+ Year Member

joined:May 31, 2006
posts:1209
votes: 7


Yes, if you can with BestBBS, you should start a poll and count votes on who wants the old or (potential) new layout.

Or, just give users the choice in the next version. Classic view or New view.
12:19 am on May 27, 2010 (gmt 0)

Administrator

WebmasterWorld Administrator rogerd is a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member

joined:Aug 2, 2000
posts:9685
votes: 0


>>give users the choice in the next version. Classic view or New view.

I did that after a major redesign of another forum. It really defused all of the "I HATE the new look and I'm NEVER coming back" sentiment. If it is technically feasible, I'd recommend doing exactly what you suggest if WebmasterWorld gets a major facelift.
4:05 am on May 27, 2010 (gmt 0)

New User

10+ Year Member

joined:May 26, 2005
posts: 35
votes: 0


as much as I can appreciate "retro chic", I'm a sucker for bells and whistles.
4:34 am on May 27, 2010 (gmt 0)

Senior Member

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member

joined:Sept 14, 2004
posts:864
votes: 0


Mmm I just think it needs brighter colors, for the most part and an updated logo and a few other design changes. It is easy on the eyes now, but the design definitely doesn't help with the "trustworthy" feel when it comes to web discussions the site deserves (because frankly, this is THE site to go to).

It makes me wonder how many visitors over the past few years stopped by, saw the design, and left without obtaining the great knowledge that the community holds.
5:20 am on May 27, 2010 (gmt 0)

New User

5+ Year Member

joined:Sept 28, 2007
posts:9
votes: 0


My vote is for the simple design (preferably the current one, but if there is a new re-design which is also simple, I will take it). Don't follow other forum sites where I don't even know whether I am reading a post or an ad or something else.

Keep the colors dull. Let the information be the highlight of the forum. It has been like that and that is why it is very successful and keep it that way.
6:15 am on May 27, 2010 (gmt 0)

New User

10+ Year Member

joined:Jan 21, 2006
posts:17
votes: 0


I like the ease of use, but the design definitely needs a makeover!
6:23 am on May 27, 2010 (gmt 0)

New User

5+ Year Member

joined:Jan 29, 2010
posts:5
votes: 0


I am also a long time lurker and I think keeping it simple (stupid! :-P ) is the best way to go with colors that are not bright so that they do not drown out the content. There's no need to complicate things and SEO with a a revamp unless that revamp is simply to upgrade code to be more W3C compatible (it's time for XHTML Transitional, WebmasterWorld!) and optimized for mobile and other burgeoning environments.
7:42 am on May 27, 2010 (gmt 0)

New User

10+ Year Member

joined:Feb 19, 2003
posts:13
votes: 0


I am nostalgic. Small facelift won't hurt but navigation and overall look is very easy and simple... don't make too much mess...
7:58 am on May 27, 2010 (gmt 0)

Senior Member

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 5+ Year Member

joined:May 9, 2007
posts:1362
votes: 0


Whatever happens, if WW is getting close to providing a "nostalgic feel" it is dead. You see, every once in a while you see a 70s car, and you go like "uh- remember when we used to drive in that?" and everyone nods and suddenly laughs, agreeing on how uncomfortable and bad it was compared to "modern" cars. But everyone will have a positive "nostalgic feel" about having seen it. But drive it again? No thanks.

So this thread alone should raise serious concerns at WW. The least thing WW should become is a museum consisting just of archived threads.

I like the simplistic design for other reasons. It puts the focus on the content, and on the content alone. Which is good and useful and a clear differentiator. And it loads fast.
9:27 am on May 27, 2010 (gmt 0)

Full Member

5+ Year Member

joined:Dec 30, 2009
posts:249
votes: 0


I don't see the issue here.

There's more options than two extremes:

1. Keep website exactly the same
2. Make a crazy graphical website with bells and whistles

If there is a redesign I'd trust that it would fall well in the middle between these areas.
9:59 am on May 27, 2010 (gmt 0)

Senior Member from US 

WebmasterWorld Senior Member tangor is a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month

joined:Nov 29, 2005
posts:6149
votes: 282


Query:

Look?

or

Info?
10:22 am on May 27, 2010 (gmt 0)

New User

5+ Year Member

joined:Jan 14, 2010
posts:7
votes: 0


Agree that the correct approach is a middle ground, no harm in changing a few images and styles to make it more pleasing the eye, but don't break the way the UI functions as it works fine as it is.
12:14 pm on May 28, 2010 (gmt 0)

Junior Member

10+ Year Member

joined:Nov 9, 2004
posts:67
votes: 0


Design should facilitate function, otherwise it’s art... how many of us are artists?

I think this is a ‘Does what it says on the tin.’ place.

Bit of ajax, refresh the current layout and add a couple of features. Like the old adage, ‘keep it simple stupid!’ - yes wickedskaman!

God, I’d love to get my hands on this sites design and development! ;-)
12:39 pm on May 28, 2010 (gmt 0)

Senior Member

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 5+ Year Member

joined:Feb 22, 2009
posts:1396
votes: 0


Hi all,

KISS


Enough said!

Cheers,
MRb
 

Join The Conversation

Moderators and Top Contributors

Hot Threads This Week

Featured Threads

Free SEO Tools

Hire Expert Members