Welcome to WebmasterWorld Guest from 188.8.131.52
Forum Moderators: rogerd
Don't be surprised to see advertising on Twitter soon. It's about the only way the service can generate revenue. But will it be enough?
Twitter's business model is starting to show. An early sign came in April, when the popular microblogging service launched in Japan and the home page for every Japanese user included a big banner ad in the top right corner.
Without real revenues, it can't survive in its existing form forever.
As Twitter users you may not want ads, but as marketers, it could be a terrific opportunity.
I'm not into Twitter much, but the complaints I hear from addicts are all focused on outages and reliability issues.
...thats why they invested into it.
[edited by: martinibuster at 5:16 pm (utc) on Aug. 19, 2008]
In the end, Twitter will most likely be sold and become a hood ornament to another service, like Gmail is to Google (GOOG) or Hotmail is to Microsoft (MSFT). The corporate buyer won't get much ad revenue, but it will pull millions of communicating consumers closer to its own business model.
Twitter could create an algorithm to analyze your messages and your friends' messages to target ads based on keywords.
Heh! They might be late to the game. There are plenty of third party apps that have been developed that will do that for you. I've been in Protected mode so the apps are useless in scraping my Tweets from a Public Timeline. And, since I monitor my small number of Followers, I know that they are not using my Tweets from a revenue generating standpoint.
That is not to say that there are not a plethora of others monetizing the Twitter Public Timelines. Sugarrae recently found some AdSense stuff going on with Tweets and Google Cache. So, they may be trying different options. ;)
Community sites that focus on a specific niche, or have organizing channels, have better value because you can place the users in a demographic/niche bucket, something that Twitter currently does not do. Although with a few [webmasterworld.com] exceptions to that rule [webmasterworld.com], that value is still limited because the members of a focused community may not necessarily be anywhere near a buying cycle. Yet even with those limitations, a focused community site is head and shoulders a better advertising value than a general community like Twitter.
One method to monetize Twitter is to allow advertisers to target the followers of popular Twitterers. But Twitter screwed that up by limiting followers to 2,000. Oh joy.
Twitter isn't DOA or dying, but imo it's going to have to turn it's focus from simply keeping the system online to making it viable for advertisers.