| 7:20 pm on Feb 26, 2007 (gmt 0)|
Have a good number of clients now running under "fully tuned" Panama accounts. Next two months should have a very good comparison of the Old vs the New (using all the bells and whistles).
Will try to report........
| 7:26 pm on Feb 26, 2007 (gmt 0)|
I have been using it for I believe going on 3 months now and can say I am seeing better and better results.
I was having a very hard time getting the cost under control but once I got a handel on it I have been very please with the redesign.
I do know there have been allot of issue getting the account transfered over but I had no issues here. We have a rather large one as well..
| 3:22 am on Feb 27, 2007 (gmt 0)|
bwnbwn, I hope you weren't trying to hard - for three months - since the new algorithm just went into effect two weeks ago.
Personally, I'm seeing nothing but positive from the switch. Some keywords need attention, but for the most part the traffic that we are getting now is better, ads are showing up more often and in higher positions (because we only advertise on relevant terms), and cost/conversion is improved.
Eventually, I expect competition will get more savvy and we'll have to increase our bids to match that, but I suppose that's good news for Yahoo and as long as ROI stays inline I won't mind either given the other improvement to quality traffic, etc.
| 1:03 pm on Feb 27, 2007 (gmt 0)|
I would love to hear more from advertisers on this...
| 1:36 pm on Feb 27, 2007 (gmt 0)|
my spend has increased by about 30% with no changes to the account on my end. Clicks seem to be up about 6% and conversions are steady.
| 2:40 pm on Feb 27, 2007 (gmt 0)|
Actually we were invited to an early beta testing and moved over several months ago I can look back but is has been I know 2-3 months. The reason I know is our expenses monthly shot up and I got chewed out by the owner...
I have been working on this since so it may have gone nation wide but we have been using it several months now.
Why on earth would you think I made this up?
Here is a message dated Jan. 24 on the cost after I updated. For your information....
| 3:53 pm on Feb 27, 2007 (gmt 0)|
bwnbwn, you may have had beta access to the Panama interface, but the algorithmic update associated with Panama didn't go into effect until starting Feb 5th. Costs don't go up due to interface changes.
| 4:23 pm on Feb 27, 2007 (gmt 0)|
There are other aspects of Pananma (if changed) could account for differences besides the Feb 5th algorithmic update.
If people are just sitting on the transitioned accounts without using all the new features Panama has to offer, then they are doing their clients an injustice.
The real test is NOT -- how is it doing before and after with no changes!
The real test IS -- using all the new features how much better can I make it perform than the old system!
| 4:50 pm on Feb 27, 2007 (gmt 0)|
I'm with you there jbgilbert,
We manipulate our bids etc constantly - quality scoring update or not.
With the new ranking methods at Yahoo, we are also now more open to spending more. In fact, we've added thousands of new keywords in the past month and we're showing cost per conversion getting better all the time on old keywords too.
| 5:05 pm on Feb 27, 2007 (gmt 0)|
exposute, you said
"you may have had beta access to the Panama interface, but the algorithmic update associated with Panama didn't go into effect until starting Feb 5th. Costs don't go up due to interface changes"
Please tell me how you know this as what your stating is fact or you think...
I will respond after I see how you know this is a fact...
| 5:29 pm on Feb 27, 2007 (gmt 0)|
Here is Yahoo's own announcement:
| 5:44 pm on Feb 27, 2007 (gmt 0)|
Expoure what I thought
this was only this part of the new platform
"both bid amount and ad quality will now determine an adís rank in search results"
We had been in the new platform for several months but this feature was actually part of it just officially launched. There was more to the Panama than this I hope you know, this was a small part of the whole change.
If you haven't already seen there is a big expense jump due to you are automacilly put into the advanced search and content search as well when updated.
Google or yahoo have never perforemed well for us in content search just a big expense.
This was one of the cost spikes I experienced and had to opt out of them again.
I have discovered other reasons for the spike and made adjustments and now have the account doing very well.
The new platform is considered Panama you are refering to just one aspect of the new platform
| 6:20 pm on Feb 27, 2007 (gmt 0)|
Right, I'm aware of this. I disagree that Panama could have affected spending prior to the algo update since just using a different tool to look at your account doesn't by itself change spending levels... unless there was a bug in your account or the process of upgrading turned on/up some features, as you allude to, that you didn't use previously.
I think that part of what we disagree on here is regarding different recent upgrades all being considered together, which they shouldn't be. And we can agree that Yahoo didn't really define the various steps that were happening very well. They allowed the several changes to be jointly called "Panama" - though they didn't want it to be called that, apparently, they also didn't offer any alternative description or named stages, etc. No need to argue about it here. How we choose to define the different account changes wasn't the point of this thread, so...
I for one am very pleased, so far, but I hope this is just the first in a series of improvements. It was getting very difficult at the end there waiting a whole year after the new platform and algo were finally announced. Several times I wanted to just stop advertising with Yahoo altogether.
Now that it's here - it's a great improvement.
And there are some things that I hope will be forthcoming soon:
What Yahoo has missed the boat on is providing large-scale users a method for editing. There is no AdWords Editor style software. This is practically a requirement for managing a significant number of keywords effectively.
There is no ability to generate custom reports yet. (Especially useful would be a single exportable .csv that included click and conversion data AND bid on the same sheet. Since we are forced to do bulk editing via Excel, at least give us one sheet to view all that data together!)
And better customer service would be nice too. When sending $10s of thousands of dollars in their direction each month it'd be nice to get a return phone call. This is improving too, though, now.