reprint
msg:4070006 | 8:21 pm on Jan 28, 2010 (gmt 0) |
"Let me just say - this is the first of some long over due changes to the homepage. " Let me tell you that in my experience, the one thing that users hate more than a change is multiple changes. Lump them together as much as you can or the screaming will not end!
|
ogletree
msg:4070036 | 9:20 pm on Jan 28, 2010 (gmt 0) |
At the very least can we go back to the original spacing of the features threads. It looks like there is something very wrong.
|
Hawkgirl
msg:4070252 | 5:32 am on Jan 29, 2010 (gmt 0) |
Thank goodness the change didn't happen at the beginning of April. I like change - once I get used to it. And no, Eleanor did not get ahold of the command and control center. If the site ever gets turned several shades of pink, then you'll know it was the little boss. :) I think everyone needs a change like this now and then - it knocks us all out of our complacency and requires paying attention once again.
|
BeeDeeDubbleU
msg:4070287 | 7:46 am on Jan 29, 2010 (gmt 0) |
We are all commenting on this without knowing the objectives of these changes. If we knew then we would be able to qualify the comments. What are the objectives?
|
wheel
msg:4070470 | 2:46 pm on Jan 29, 2010 (gmt 0) |
Relevant and useful user experience :).
|
vrtlw
msg:4070829 | 1:52 am on Jan 30, 2010 (gmt 0) |
While I can work with the design of the front page on my blackberry tour (not ideal but workable) the "messages" column in the individual forums is a big issue. Not sure if it was like this before the update or not but I wonder if that should be reviewed?
|
bumpski
msg:4071407 | 10:57 am on Jan 31, 2010 (gmt 0) |
I always keep my bookmarks in view to the left. Now with home page navigation to the left, the left side of my monitor is sagging. Not to mention all those desktop icons to the left. Sorry, Navigation should be next to the scroll bar, far more user friendly and balanced when you consider the entire desktop landscape. I know there is this silly knob that clicks loudly in the center of the mouse, but I like to surf fast and with stealth. Can't beat free design input! Anyway content is king, and WW has that! (Hey that's free too!)
|
tangor
msg:4071540 | 6:45 pm on Jan 31, 2010 (gmt 0) |
I like the change (personally prefer left nav to right). I am not happy with the line-height spacing on the front page, but that's a minor.
|
BeeDeeDubbleU
msg:4071585 | 8:43 pm on Jan 31, 2010 (gmt 0) |
| While I can work with the design of the front page on my blackberry tour (not ideal but workable) the "messages" column in the individual forums is a big issue. |
|
Who wants to spend any time on WW on a blackberry? ;) I see that we now have quick ways of adding HTML formatting to replies but not on the Quick Reply. Why not offer the same functionality there?
|
vrtlw
msg:4072179 | 7:57 pm on Feb 1, 2010 (gmt 0) |
| Who wants to spend any time on WW on a blackberry? |
|
Me and I suspect a sufficient percentage of other users and contributors would also.
|
encyclo
msg:4072182 | 8:07 pm on Feb 1, 2010 (gmt 0) |
| I see that we now have quick ways of adding HTML formatting to replies but not on the Quick Reply. Why not offer the same functionality there? |
|
At the risk of being pedantic, I suspect the Quick reply is for replying quickly - so the fancy formatting is not required. ;)
|
tangor
msg:4072192 | 8:11 pm on Feb 1, 2010 (gmt 0) |
Quick reply does not work properly at this time.
|
Leosghost
msg:4072231 | 9:06 pm on Feb 1, 2010 (gmt 0) |
| Quick reply does not work properly at this time. |
|
saw that glitch too briefly about 30 mins ago ( message was "error:post is too short or no content etc" ..had to copy reply text ..refresh page ..paste reply text before it would work ..kittens in the gubbinses ? :)
works now though :)
|
anallawalla
msg:4074652 | 11:14 pm on Feb 4, 2010 (gmt 0) |
I like the new left column nav too.
|
BeeDeeDubbleU
msg:4074789 | 8:13 am on Feb 5, 2010 (gmt 0) |
| At the risk of being pedantic, I suspect the Quick reply is for replying quickly - so the fancy formatting is not required. |
|
OK, I just posted this using the quick reply. For the quote above I had to type in the quote tags long hand. If I had a button to do this wouldn't this be quicker? (It would in my logic.)
|
engine
msg:4074826 | 9:37 am on Feb 5, 2010 (gmt 0) |
| If I had a button to do this wouldn't this be quicker? |
|
You do, in the standard "reply to this topic" ;)
The quick reply was never intended to enable adding any code. etc.
|
BeeDeeDubbleU
msg:4074899 | 1:08 pm on Feb 5, 2010 (gmt 0) |
Ah, so the quick reply is actually the slow reply? ;)
|
BeeDeeDubbleU
msg:4076812 | 8:50 am on Feb 9, 2010 (gmt 0) |
Is there a problem with the adding of ul's? I just used the new options and the text size in the UL increased.
See [webmasterworld.com...]
|
Seb7
msg:4077769 | 5:32 pm on Feb 10, 2010 (gmt 0) |
Please put the home page back. plz plz :)
|
carguy84
msg:4078167 | 6:34 am on Feb 11, 2010 (gmt 0) |
^ ditto that. It's uncanny, but I definitely have cut down on my visitation since the redesign. Creature of consistency or not wanting to reward a mistake - I'm not sure which.
|
vivalasvegas
msg:4078201 | 10:08 am on Feb 11, 2010 (gmt 0) |
I may get used to the new design/page structure eventually, but after several visits I still find it odd to have the navigation on the left.
| At the very least can we go back to the original spacing of the features threads. It looks like there is something very wrong. |
|
I agree.
|
ken_b
msg:4085910 | 9:32 pm on Feb 23, 2010 (gmt 0) |
I really like the "Style Code Error" feature!
Just ran into it, and REALLY appreciate it!
Thanks for that goodie. :)
|
| This 82 message thread spans 3 pages: < < 82 ( 1 2 [3] ) |
|
|
