homepage Welcome to WebmasterWorld Guest from 54.243.12.156
register, free tools, login, search, subscribe, help, library, announcements, recent posts, open posts,
Accredited PayPal World Seller

Visit PubCon.com
Home / Forums Index / Hardware and OS Related Technologies / Webmaster Hardware
Forum Library, Charter, Moderator: open

Webmaster Hardware Forum

    
1 CPU vs. 2?
for a DB server
LifeinAsia




msg:3644881
 4:15 pm on May 8, 2008 (gmt 0)

Which configuration do you think is better for a DB server (Win 2003, SQL 2005)?
- single quad-core 2.33 GHz
- dual quad-core 1.6 GHz
Everythign else is equal (including the price).

SQL 2005 is only going to have a 1-processor license, so it it betther to share the 2.33 CPU with the OS or dedicate one 1.6 all to itself?

 

Ocean10000




msg:3646403
 4:41 am on May 10, 2008 (gmt 0)

I personally prefer dual processor machines, for the simple reason an application can go nuts and eat up all the time on one cpu, and the other will be untouched and the machine will still be responsive.

But since these CPU's have multiple cores already, which is treated as separate CPU's. I would go for the 2.33 GHZ, since it just plan faster and has more CPU power behind it.

Global Options:
 top home search open messages active posts  
 

Home / Forums Index / Hardware and OS Related Technologies / Webmaster Hardware
rss feed

All trademarks and copyrights held by respective owners. Member comments are owned by the poster.
Terms of Service ¦ Privacy Policy ¦ Report Problem ¦ About
© Webmaster World 1996-2014 all rights reserved