| 1:02 am on Dec 2, 2009 (gmt 0)|
Rather than focus on the aesthetic design, you should focus on the functional design. The prettiest site in the world is worthless if people can't navigate around or find what they want. Most designers don't understand that- they spend all their time making things look pretty without considering HOW people use the site.
| 1:07 am on Dec 2, 2009 (gmt 0)|
That's what I thought: designers charge too much for a work which is, hummm, a commodity (whereas generating useful unique content is a highly skilled work).
That's why I refrained from keeping investing on design.
But I wonder if going from a really bad design to a really good design could make a significant difference.
| 1:21 am on Dec 2, 2009 (gmt 0)|
Try using a heat map report to see what you users are doing and clicking on.
| 5:19 am on Dec 2, 2009 (gmt 0)|
|But I wonder if going from a really bad design to a really good design could make a significant difference. |
Have a look around the site below, it will change the way you think about "presentation" - which is what most people are talking about when they say "design." There are many aspects of "design" as mentioned above - visual design is the least important of all these.
Visual design is important, IMO, only in that it presents the appropriate environment for the users to solve their problems.
| 10:29 am on Dec 3, 2009 (gmt 0)|
Prettiness doesn't count for much, take webmasterworld as an example. It sure ain't pretty but it is functional and utilitarian.
I don't think I'd say that design work is a commodity. The best designers produce very good work, the problem is that a lot of poor designers lose sight of the goal of the site they are working on and think that design in and of itself is what makes a site successful. That has never been true in anything and certainly not in web design.
I doubt the design of your site makes that much difference unless it obscures the utility of your site.
| 6:18 pm on Dec 4, 2009 (gmt 0)|
Look at mint.com. They became successful, in a large part, because they focused on good design and presentation.
| 3:32 pm on Dec 5, 2009 (gmt 0)|
There are several threads on WebmasterWorld about ugly sites that make money. Have a search
| 12:55 pm on Dec 8, 2009 (gmt 0)|
|ugly sites that make money |
That's the point: would they make more money if they weren't ugly?
| 8:07 pm on Dec 8, 2009 (gmt 0)|
The concept of "ulgy sites sell" is that you can increse sales by making it less pretty. It really has nothing to do with pretty it has more to do with being more useful. Your not tring to make it ugly your just removing pretty things that get in the way. The web is not like TV or Magzines. Most people come to the web with a goal in mind. People use TV and magazines to entertain themnselves and advertisers jump out at them and convince them to do something.