homepage Welcome to WebmasterWorld Guest from
register, free tools, login, search, pro membership, help, library, announcements, recent posts, open posts,
Pubcon Platinum Sponsor 2014
Home / Forums Index / WebmasterWorld / Webmaster General
Forum Library, Charter, Moderators: phranque

Webmaster General Forum

cloaking, variation #27

WebmasterWorld Senior Member lucy24 us a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time Top Contributors Of The Month

Msg#: 4613552 posted 1:49 am on Sep 29, 2013 (gmt 0)

cloaking = showing different content to a robot, especially a search engine, than to a human

Now, what about...
showing the same content, but in a different way?

Human sees an image via CSS-- for example as a list-item-marker or as background. Robot sees the same image in an element set to {display: none;}.

I thought of it while looking over some stuff from last month's logs. There was one spell covering several days-- multiple visits-- where facebook went into absolute hysterics because it had been sent to a page that contains no images. The only <img> tag it could find was piwik's administrative dot, which is strictly off limits to non-humans. It kept asking for it, dozens and dozens of times. The human-visible images are in the CSS. (Facebook does not pick up external stylesheets, and apparently does not even read internal CSS.)

So if I put a copy of the same image inside a non-displaying element, the robot can "see" it, while humans are unaffected. Link to same URL, so there's no duplicate download for the browser.

Anyone foresee a problem?


Global Options:
 top home search open messages active posts  

Home / Forums Index / WebmasterWorld / Webmaster General
rss feed

All trademarks and copyrights held by respective owners. Member comments are owned by the poster.
Home ¦ Free Tools ¦ Terms of Service ¦ Privacy Policy ¦ Report Problem ¦ About ¦ Library ¦ Newsletter
WebmasterWorld is a Developer Shed Community owned by Jim Boykin.
© Webmaster World 1996-2014 all rights reserved