BeeDeeDubbleU
msg:4542688 | 9:54 pm on Feb 5, 2013 (gmt 0) |
Web Position Gold?
|
HLTc
msg:4542692 | 10:12 pm on Feb 5, 2013 (gmt 0) |
Yyyyyyyeeeeeeeeeeeahhhhhh!
Thats the one!
Anything still that good around today?
|
lorax
msg:4542712 | 11:38 pm on Feb 5, 2013 (gmt 0) |
Well... using something like WPG would be akin to using a timing light on any late model car. It makes little sense because everything has evolved so much and the info WPG gave you is no longer relevant and/or it would be wrong for how SEO works today.
|
BeeDeeDubbleU
msg:4542846 | 8:06 am on Feb 6, 2013 (gmt 0) |
| ... and the info WPG gave you is no longer relevant and/or it would be wrong for how SEO works today. |
|
Of course it would be wrong but I don't think anyone is suggesting that any current package would offer the same advice or come to the same conclusions. ;)
WPG was excellent back then. I used it when I started out and I learned a lot about SEO from it ... and it worked! There are still some quite important on page factors to be considered in SEO along with the newere off page factors. Any current package designed along the same lines for today, which could guide people through the morass could be equally useful.
|
lorax
msg:4543123 | 8:23 pm on Feb 6, 2013 (gmt 0) |
Sorry if I was brash/flippant.
Relying on the advice of any software is a fools folly IMHO. Some of the better packages deliver great data/information but many of them are only as good as the programmers that built them and often come without the intuition built over years of working in a market space and understanding the larger scope of SEO and authority building. The better software I've seen costs several hundred dollars a month and are a combination of data aggregator, proprietary crawler, and assessment tools. They don't provide advice. They provide data and leave it to you to determine the best course of action.
|
|
