homepage Welcome to WebmasterWorld Guest from 54.234.141.47
register, free tools, login, search, pro membership, help, library, announcements, recent posts, open posts,
Pubcon Platinum Sponsor 2014
Home / Forums Index / WebmasterWorld / Webmaster General
Forum Library, Charter, Moderators: phranque

Webmaster General Forum

    
Wikipedia Editor Storm Continues, Now to Seek Proof of Credentials
engine

WebmasterWorld Administrator engine us a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month Best Post Of The Month



 
Msg#: 3276252 posted 8:57 am on Mar 9, 2007 (gmt 0)

Following revelations that a high-ranking member of Wikipedia's bureaucracy used his cloak of anonymity to lie about being a professor of religion, the free Internet encyclopedia plans to ask contributors who claim such credentials to identify themselves.

Wikipedia founder Jimmy Wales said in interviews by phone and instant message Wednesday from Japan that contributors still would be able to remain anonymous. But he said they should only be allowed to cite some professional expertise in a subject if those credentials have been verified.

"We always prefer to give a positive incentive rather than absolute prohibition, so that people can contribute without a lot of hassle," Wales wrote.

Wikipedia Editor Storm Continues, Now to Seek Proof of Credentials [seattlepi.nwsource.com]

This follows on from the earlier story: "Fake Wikipedia editor unmasked" [webmasterworld.com]

 

percentages

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



 
Msg#: 3276252 posted 10:07 am on Mar 9, 2007 (gmt 0)

Been there.....done that......it is DMOZ all over again....

We are simply seeing the battle of "free" commercial serps against sponsorship!

Those that don't want to pay will attempt to manipulate for a while........seen it all before with DMoz.....it doesn't work long-term!

wheel

WebmasterWorld Senior Member wheel us a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member



 
Msg#: 3276252 posted 1:12 pm on Mar 9, 2007 (gmt 0)

Let me get this straight. This was a paid staff member of wikipedia?

balam

10+ Year Member



 
Msg#: 3276252 posted 1:57 pm on Mar 9, 2007 (gmt 0)

> Been there.....done that......

...a couple of days ago. Old news. :/

physics

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



 
Msg#: 3276252 posted 11:19 pm on Mar 10, 2007 (gmt 0)

They allow people to remain anonymous and then act surprised when people falsely claim to be professors?
The thing that is surprising though is that he was employed by Wikia (and then dismissed when this came out). Um guys, you didn't check his references or even find it surprising that your 24 year old employee claimed to be a religion professor? Sounds like the Wiki guys need to start checking their references in more ways than one ;)

Liane

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



 
Msg#: 3276252 posted 3:55 pm on Mar 11, 2007 (gmt 0)

Wheel,

In the article Engine cited in the first post, it states that Jordan was indeed hired by Wikia Inc. and Jordan was quoted as saying:

"It was, quite honestly, my impression that it was well known that I was not who I claimed to be, and that in the absence of any confirmation, no respectible (sic) publication would print it," he wrote.

LOL ... I guess that means he doesn't think Wikipoedia is a respectable publication!

Considering he was a paid employee (for whatever period of time) and a prolific contributor, I have to agree with his assessment! Lux et Veritas indeed!

rich_b

10+ Year Member



 
Msg#: 3276252 posted 8:08 am on Mar 12, 2007 (gmt 0)

>> I guess that means he doesn't think Wikipoedia is a respectable publication!

I hope he does think that because that is indeed the case.

gibbergibber

10+ Year Member



 
Msg#: 3276252 posted 4:26 pm on Mar 12, 2007 (gmt 0)

There isn't a problem with people being anonymous because there's no sense of authority behind an anonymous post.

When they claim to be a professor, you start trusting them more than if they gave no name at all.

--Let me get this straight. This was a paid staff member of wikipedia?--

He was a paid member of Wikia, which is apparently the commercial arm of Wikipedia.

Whether he was paid or not, he was a VERY high up member of wikipedia. The fact that he got caught and Wales' lack of reaction to it made it seem like Wikipedia doesn't really care if people lie about their credentials.

Global Options:
 top home search open messages active posts  
 

Home / Forums Index / WebmasterWorld / Webmaster General
rss feed

All trademarks and copyrights held by respective owners. Member comments are owned by the poster.
Home ¦ Free Tools ¦ Terms of Service ¦ Privacy Policy ¦ Report Problem ¦ About ¦ Library ¦ Newsletter
WebmasterWorld is a Developer Shed Community owned by Jim Boykin.
© Webmaster World 1996-2014 all rights reserved